From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: tuhs-bounces@minnie.tuhs.org X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on inbox.vuxu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.9 required=5.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SUBJ_ALL_CAPS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from minnie.tuhs.org (minnie.tuhs.org [45.79.103.53]) by inbox.vuxu.org (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id 5fedc24a for ; Wed, 7 Nov 2018 02:52:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix, from userid 112) id 41DC7A22DE; Wed, 7 Nov 2018 12:52:24 +1000 (AEST) Received: from minnie.tuhs.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 72F03A22AC; Wed, 7 Nov 2018 12:52:01 +1000 (AEST) Received: by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix, from userid 112) id D3947A22A0; Wed, 7 Nov 2018 11:21:09 +1000 (AEST) X-Greylist: delayed 452 seconds by postgrey-1.35 at minnie.tuhs.org; Wed, 07 Nov 2018 11:21:09 AEST Received: from avasout04.plus.net (avasout04.plus.net [212.159.14.19]) by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 48FDC94111 for ; Wed, 7 Nov 2018 11:21:09 +1000 (AEST) Received: from mindy.dunnington.cx ([84.92.27.202]) by smtp with ESMTP id KCPWgK5dOsYLZKCPXg8ujq; Wed, 07 Nov 2018 01:13:35 +0000 X-CM-Score: 0.00 X-CNFS-Analysis: v=2.3 cv=Teu4SyYh c=1 sm=1 tr=0 a=W5Q3TbzFkoGugBkjAUuyvQ==:117 a=W5Q3TbzFkoGugBkjAUuyvQ==:17 a=IkcTkHD0fZMA:10 a=JHtHm7312UAA:10 a=ii_3M4RygzX6ez-7Jv0A:9 a=ld0E8_3Xu0yZSejX:21 a=0ITnsO2_yBEGGRMo:21 a=QEXdDO2ut3YA:10 a=pHzHmUro8NiASowvMSCR:22 a=nt3jZW36AmriUCFCBwmW:22 Received: from [172.17.2.96] (natpool1.dunnington.cx [84.92.27.201]) by mindy.dunnington.cx (8.12.9/8.12.9/8.12.9.08) with ESMTP id wA7139Z8028345 for ; Wed, 7 Nov 2018 01:03:09 GMT To: tuhs@minnie.tuhs.org References: <0289fa26-d157-8a65-389e-61dd7a01fcc4@spamtrap.tnetconsulting.net> <7d595808-fff7-4c1c-d969-362693ab2672@spamtrap.tnetconsulting.net> From: Pete Turnbull Message-ID: <1a28d6a4-7f9a-4e91-db5e-fa14bc06b48d@dunnington.plus.com> Date: Wed, 7 Nov 2018 01:03:08 +0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.9.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <7d595808-fff7-4c1c-d969-362693ab2672@spamtrap.tnetconsulting.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-GB Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-CMAE-Envelope: MS4wfEAoHZmSLnk3CeofOm3CXAVj/5RQpyUlzZfD31KWgQWiS5+xhItLutVCkF3KEd0srjlaEw2KiRWss4r0+DunyVpFJi8B80nneoTQPOsOIwUYcZh5OxmO Uu3EA1yciKxPhe48rCtfEU5nsJTEwkSqaic5AoJ5+1jvPNeXuaDpoqfRwqONjXXXVkjBIwwwKeJpaA== Subject: Re: [TUHS] YP / NIS / NIS+ / LDAP X-BeenThere: tuhs@minnie.tuhs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: The Unix Heritage Society mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: tuhs-bounces@minnie.tuhs.org Sender: "TUHS" On 06/11/2018 05:24, Grant Taylor via TUHS wrote: > On 11/05/2018 03:34 PM, Dan Cross wrote: >> Security, in general, usually seeks to address five questions: >> >> 1. Authentication - Is some entity who it claims to be? >> 2. Authorization - Is some entity allowed to perform some action? >> 3. Privacy - Can a third party snoop on a private conversation between >> two entities? >> 4. Integrity - Can a third party alter communications between two >> entities in an undetectable way? >> 5. Non-repudiation - Can it be definitively shown that some entity was >> a party to some communication? > > The 3rd A that I'm used to is "Access Control".  Is the requested action > allowed given the above information. Access Control = Authorisation. Everywhere I've been, AAA = Authentication, Authorisation, Accounting. -- Pete Pete Turnbull