From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on inbox.vuxu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=5.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from minnie.tuhs.org (minnie.tuhs.org [45.79.103.53]) by inbox.vuxu.org (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id 4c8e6940 for ; Fri, 3 Jan 2020 19:38:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix, from userid 112) id BAD61951CA; Sat, 4 Jan 2020 05:38:44 +1000 (AEST) Received: from minnie.tuhs.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 020F095196; Sat, 4 Jan 2020 05:38:20 +1000 (AEST) Received: by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix, from userid 112) id B15179516C; Sat, 4 Jan 2020 05:38:16 +1000 (AEST) Received: from marmaro.de (marmaro.de [176.28.23.198]) by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC1689516B for ; Sat, 4 Jan 2020 05:38:15 +1000 (AEST) Received: by marmaro.de (masqmail 0.3.6-dev, from userid 1000) id 1inSly-4mJ-00 for ; Fri, 03 Jan 2020 20:38:14 +0100 To: tuhs@minnie.tuhs.org In-reply-to: <1inMKv-0Km-00@marmaro.de> References: <1inMKv-0Km-00@marmaro.de> Comments: In-reply-to markus schnalke message dated "Fri, 03 Jan 2020 13:45:53 +0100." MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <18370.1578080294.1@marmaro.de> Date: Fri, 03 Jan 2020 20:38:14 +0100 From: markus schnalke Message-ID: <1inSly-4mJ-00@marmaro.de> Subject: Re: [TUHS] sh: cmd | >file X-BeenThere: tuhs@minnie.tuhs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.26 Precedence: list List-Id: The Unix Heritage Society mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: tuhs-bounces@minnie.tuhs.org Sender: "TUHS" Hoi. [2020-01-03 13:45] markus schnalke > > I'd be interested in any stories and information around this > topic. Especially I'd like to know since when and why ``>file'' is a full command? Was it clever design or by accident? meillo