From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on inbox.vuxu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=5.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from minnie.tuhs.org (minnie.tuhs.org [45.79.103.53]) by inbox.vuxu.org (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id 5b39de93 for ; Sat, 18 Jan 2020 22:11:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix, from userid 112) id 422449C130; Sun, 19 Jan 2020 08:11:29 +1000 (AEST) Received: from minnie.tuhs.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 890209C0F9; Sun, 19 Jan 2020 08:11:17 +1000 (AEST) Received: by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix, from userid 112) id 707D39C0F9; Sun, 19 Jan 2020 08:11:16 +1000 (AEST) Received: from marmaro.de (marmaro.de [176.28.23.198]) by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 94A1D9BDD8 for ; Sun, 19 Jan 2020 08:11:15 +1000 (AEST) Received: by marmaro.de (masqmail 0.3.6-dev, from userid 1000) id 1iswJG-1JH-00 for ; Sat, 18 Jan 2020 23:11:14 +0100 To: tuhs@minnie.tuhs.org In-reply-to: <20200118153725.GD28686@mcvoy.com> References: <20200109012830.GC16808@mcvoy.com> <20200109020720.GG16808@mcvoy.com> <202001090423.0094NooZ379407@darkstar.fourwinds.com> <20200118153725.GD28686@mcvoy.com> Comments: In-reply-to Larry McVoy message dated "Sat, 18 Jan 2020 07:37:25 -0800." MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <5038.1579385474.1@marmaro.de> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Sat, 18 Jan 2020 23:11:14 +0100 From: markus schnalke Message-ID: <1iswJG-1JH-00@marmaro.de> Subject: Re: [TUHS] screen editors X-BeenThere: tuhs@minnie.tuhs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.26 Precedence: list List-Id: The Unix Heritage Society mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: tuhs-bounces@minnie.tuhs.org Sender: "TUHS" Hoi. Not wanting to heaten this rather annoying editor discussion, but as no one yet has mentioned argv[0]: [2020-01-18 07:37] Larry McVoy > On Fri, Jan 17, 2020 at 10:13:45PM -0500, Clem Cole wrote: > > = > > To be you are either compatible or not. I would have been ok to have h= ad > > an option that you could turn on that gave you new behavior (but make t= he > > user turn it on thank you). > If it was compat by default then you > wouldn't learn any of the new stuff. = > set compatible Shouldn't all that be solved by acting compatible if called as `vi' and being free from compatibility bounds when called as `vim'? If I say `vi' I want a vi. If I want Vim, I say so. (No matter if these are links to the same binary.) Problem solved. Everyone happy? meillo