From: peter.jeremy@alcatel.com.au (Peter Jeremy)
Subject: [pups] Interesting PDP/Xenix History
Date: Thu, 28 Mar 2002 13:33:20 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20020328133320.K78085@gsmx07.alcatel.com.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20020328115808.C6079@wantadilla.lemis.com>; from grog@lemis.com on Thu, Mar 28, 2002 at 11:58:08AM +1030
On 2002-Mar-28 11:58:08 +1030, Greg 'groggy' Lehey <grog at lemis.com> wrote:
>I've used XENIX/386 in the early 90s.
I recall using XENIX/286 in the mid 80's. We were porting some
software from Micro/RSX on a PDP-11/03. The AT-class box (an ITT
XTRA/XL) was significantly faster. And later, having 8 developers on
one 8MHz 80286 was, err, interesting. I also remember having it panic
when it tried to fork a large (~2MB) process.
> The development tools were terrible,
And unbundled. I don't recall too many problems with the C compiler,
but we were porting Pascal - and the Pascal compiler was atrocious.
The object code (and whether a piece of code would compile at all)
seemed to depend on whim of the compiler. Obviously whoever wrote it
hadn't grasped the concepts of initialising variables, making arrays
large enough to fit their contents or only using a single piece of
memory to store one thing at a time :-).
> but I found somebody who had ported the GNU tools to XENIX
>(doing it yourself would rob you of your sanity).
I don't think you could get any of the GNU tools to run on a 286 so I
was mostly limited to the SCO tools. I recall doctoring MicroEmacs so
that it was all small model but allocated the buffers in "far" memory
- that gave me the ability to edit large files with acceptable
performance.
Peter
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-03-28 2:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-03-25 2:39 Frank Wortner
2002-03-25 10:15 ` Johnny Billquist
2002-03-25 15:18 ` Frank Wortner
2002-03-26 7:41 ` Michael Davidson
2002-03-26 18:06 ` Frank Wortner
2002-03-25 10:38 ` Robert Tillyard
2002-03-26 23:41 ` Warren Toomey
2002-03-27 0:47 ` Michael Davidson
2002-03-27 23:24 ` Lars Buitinck
2002-03-27 23:58 ` Michael Davidson
2002-03-29 21:36 ` Lars Buitinck
2002-03-28 1:28 ` Greg 'groggy' Lehey
2002-03-28 2:33 ` Peter Jeremy [this message]
2002-03-30 11:03 ` Lars Buitinck
2002-03-30 23:38 ` Greg 'groggy' Lehey
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-04-03 9:52 asmodai
2002-04-03 9:49 asmodai
2002-04-03 9:14 Fred N. van Kempen
2002-04-03 9:45 ` quapla
2002-04-03 16:25 ` Michael Davidson
2002-04-02 22:38 asmodai
2002-04-03 3:31 ` Frank Wortner
2002-03-23 19:43 Martin Crehan
2002-03-24 4:26 ` Warren Toomey
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20020328133320.K78085@gsmx07.alcatel.com.au \
--to=peter.jeremy@alcatel.com.au \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).