The Unix Heritage Society mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: cdl@mpl.ucsd.edu (Carl Lowenstein)
Subject: [pups] re: PDP-9
Date: Wed, 21 Aug 2002 12:59:42 -0700 (PDT)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200208211959.MAA04677@opihi.ucsd.edu> (raw)

> To: pups at minnie.tuhs.org
> From: Dennis Ritchie <dmr at plan9.bell-labs.com>
> Subject: [pups] re: PDP-9
> Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2002 23:55:55 -0400
> 
> Bilquist said (quoting Buitinck):
> 
>  > > we all know that UNIX first ran on the PDP-7 and then on the PDP-11/20,
>  > > but does anyone know anything about PDP-9 UNIX?  it\'s mentioned in \"The
>  > > UNIX Time-Sharing System\" in the V7 manual:
>  > > 
>  > > \"The earliest [version of UNIX] (circa 1969-70) ran on the Digital
>  > > Equipment Corporation PDP-7 and -9 computers.\"
> 
>  > Hmmm, I cannot exactly answer that, but the PDP-7 and PDP-9 were both
>  > 18-bit machines, and somewhat compatible, I believe.
>  > The whole line is (I believe):
> 
>  > PDP-4 -> PDP-7 -> PDP-9 -> PDP-15
> 
>  > So I guess that if you had it running on a PDP-7, you could probably
>  > almost take the code unmodified and run it on the PDP-9.
>  > The PDP-15 have a different bus (Unibus?) I believe, and thus,
>  > peripherials are different from the predecessors.
>  > This obviosuly affects the OS. :-)
> 
> The 7, 9, 15 were very compatible.  I think the -15
> had some scheme for using an index register, which
> the earlier ones didn't have, but it was otherwise
> pretty much identical in IS architecture.
> 
> There was very little rewriting to try Unix out
> on the -9 and -15; perhaps just some tweaks in
> the disk device commands.  I don't think the
> system actually ran on either for more than a few
> hours.  Ken was just playing around.
> 
> The -15 may have had an electrically different
> bus, but I'm reasonably sure it was not a Unibus.
> All of them used IOT instructions, not memory-mapped
> IO registers.
> 
> 	Dennis

What I remember, as the last gasp of PDP-15 production was a
dual-processor setup, linked with a PDP-11.  The intent was to take
advantage of the lower-cost Unibus peripherals.  I remember the
sales literature, but do not recall ever seeing one.

    carl
-- 
    carl lowenstein         marine physical lab     u.c. san diego
                                                 clowenst at ucsd.edu



             reply	other threads:[~2002-08-21 19:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2002-08-21 19:59 Carl Lowenstein [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-08-21  8:01 [pups] PDP-9 Roger Ivie
2002-08-21  3:55 [pups] PDP-9 Dennis Ritchie
2002-08-21  9:19 ` Lars Brinkhoff
2002-08-21  9:21 ` Johnny Billquist
2002-08-22  2:06   ` Frank Wortner

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200208211959.MAA04677@opihi.ucsd.edu \
    --to=cdl@mpl.ucsd.edu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).