From: cdl@mpl.ucsd.edu (Carl Lowenstein)
Subject: [pups] re: PDP-9
Date: Wed, 21 Aug 2002 12:59:42 -0700 (PDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200208211959.MAA04677@opihi.ucsd.edu> (raw)
> To: pups at minnie.tuhs.org
> From: Dennis Ritchie <dmr at plan9.bell-labs.com>
> Subject: [pups] re: PDP-9
> Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2002 23:55:55 -0400
>
> Bilquist said (quoting Buitinck):
>
> > > we all know that UNIX first ran on the PDP-7 and then on the PDP-11/20,
> > > but does anyone know anything about PDP-9 UNIX? it\'s mentioned in \"The
> > > UNIX Time-Sharing System\" in the V7 manual:
> > >
> > > \"The earliest [version of UNIX] (circa 1969-70) ran on the Digital
> > > Equipment Corporation PDP-7 and -9 computers.\"
>
> > Hmmm, I cannot exactly answer that, but the PDP-7 and PDP-9 were both
> > 18-bit machines, and somewhat compatible, I believe.
> > The whole line is (I believe):
>
> > PDP-4 -> PDP-7 -> PDP-9 -> PDP-15
>
> > So I guess that if you had it running on a PDP-7, you could probably
> > almost take the code unmodified and run it on the PDP-9.
> > The PDP-15 have a different bus (Unibus?) I believe, and thus,
> > peripherials are different from the predecessors.
> > This obviosuly affects the OS. :-)
>
> The 7, 9, 15 were very compatible. I think the -15
> had some scheme for using an index register, which
> the earlier ones didn't have, but it was otherwise
> pretty much identical in IS architecture.
>
> There was very little rewriting to try Unix out
> on the -9 and -15; perhaps just some tweaks in
> the disk device commands. I don't think the
> system actually ran on either for more than a few
> hours. Ken was just playing around.
>
> The -15 may have had an electrically different
> bus, but I'm reasonably sure it was not a Unibus.
> All of them used IOT instructions, not memory-mapped
> IO registers.
>
> Dennis
What I remember, as the last gasp of PDP-15 production was a
dual-processor setup, linked with a PDP-11. The intent was to take
advantage of the lower-cost Unibus peripherals. I remember the
sales literature, but do not recall ever seeing one.
carl
--
carl lowenstein marine physical lab u.c. san diego
clowenst at ucsd.edu
next reply other threads:[~2002-08-21 19:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-08-21 19:59 Carl Lowenstein [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-08-21 8:01 [pups] PDP-9 Roger Ivie
2002-08-21 3:55 [pups] PDP-9 Dennis Ritchie
2002-08-21 9:19 ` Lars Brinkhoff
2002-08-21 9:21 ` Johnny Billquist
2002-08-22 2:06 ` Frank Wortner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200208211959.MAA04677@opihi.ucsd.edu \
--to=cdl@mpl.ucsd.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).