The Unix Heritage Society mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: cdl@mpl.ucsd.edu (Carl Lowenstein)
Subject: [pups] Unix and PDP11/20 (was PDP9?)
Date: Wed, 4 Sep 2002 15:44:18 -0700 (PDT)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200209042244.PAA08591@opihi.ucsd.edu> (raw)

> From: Dennis Ritchie <dmr at plan9.bell-labs.com>
> Subject: [pups] Unix and PDP11/20 (was PDP9?)
> Date: Wed, 4 Sep 2002 00:21:40 -0400
> 
> I'm not positive about the logo on our first PDP-11.

The text accompanying the picture "Ken and Den" somewhere on your web site
says that the logo on your first PDP-11 was just "PDP-11" without the /20.

> On the earliest handbook I have, the front panel photo
> just shows "PDP11", though inside the handbook
> it does talk about the two models (11/10 and 11/20).
> Both had the same KA11 processor, but the basic
> 11/10 sported 1024Kw ROM memory plus a generous
> 128 words of RAM, while the 11-20 had
> 4096Kw core RAM, and the ASR33 Teletype was included.
> You could add more RAM to the 11/20.

I fear that you have suffered a "units slip" saying 1024Kw
and 4096Kw when you meant 1Kw and 4Kw respectively.

> Incidentally, the machine's handbook was a wonder.
> In 104 pages (each 5.25x8 inches), it described the whole
> system: not only the instruction set but the theory
> of the Unibus (including some logic diagrams) together with
> programming specifications for the TTY, the clock,
> and the paper tape reader.
> 
> 	Dennis

Agreed, "PDP11 Handbook Second Edition" was a really good book
Occasionally I wonder if I ever had my hands on a "First Edition"
and threw it away when the second edition came out.  Not knowing
that both the computer and the handbook would become classics.

    carl
-- 
    carl lowenstein         marine physical lab     u.c. san diego
                                                 clowenst at ucsd.edu



             reply	other threads:[~2002-09-04 22:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2002-09-04 22:44 Carl Lowenstein [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-09-08 21:48 John Holden
2002-09-07  0:36 Carl Lowenstein
2002-09-06  6:08 Dennis Ritchie
2002-09-04 23:48 John Holden
2002-09-04  4:21 Dennis Ritchie
2002-09-04 21:58 ` Johnny Billquist
2002-09-12 21:27   ` Jeffrey Sharp

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200209042244.PAA08591@opihi.ucsd.edu \
    --to=cdl@mpl.ucsd.edu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).