[pups] Success!

[pups] Success!

[Steven M. Schultz]

> From: Christopher McNabb <cmcnabb at vt.edu>
> $ dmesg
> 
> Feb 25 12:02
> ...
> <5>ra0: Ver 2 mod 3
> ra0: RD54  size=311200
> attaching qe0 csr 174440
> qe0: DEC DEQNA addr 08:00:2b:07:b7:53
> attaching lo0
> 
> phys mem  = 2097152
> avail mem = 1727488
> user mem  = 307200

	Congratulations!

> Now it looks like all I have left to do is install 400 odd patches.

	Actually you only need to install the ones _after_ the one listed
	in /VERSION.    Look at the first line of /VERSION, it should look
	something like this:

		Current Patch Level: 444

	then all you need are the ones between your current version and 444
	(which is the latest).

	Be sure you have the complete system (all the sources, and include
	files, etc) installed and read/follow the directions (which are
	quite extensive) included with each patch.   SOME patches can be
	"batched" (if a couple patches in sequence are updating the kernel
	then you don't need to rebuild the kernel after each patch, etc).

	Good Luck!

	Steven Schultz

[pups] Success!

[Fred N. van Kempen]

Chris writes:

> Well, here are the results of my weekends "hacking":
Yay!  It lives! Good work, dude!

--fred

[pups] Success!

[Steven M. Schultz]

> From: David Evans <dfevans at bbcr.uwaterloo.ca>
> > Now it looks like all I have left to do is install 400 odd patches.

> 
>   If somebody goes through this pain, any chance of making a new source kit?

	Most of the kits I've seen out there are around #430 or so - that
	only leaves a dozen or so patches that need to be applied.

> Though I guess some of the patches are not necessarily desirable in all
> circumstances...

	By and large they are not only desirable but necessary/mandatory.  There
	are very few 'frivolous' ("gee, this looks like fun") patches in the
	batch.   Trying to "pick and choose" which parts of which patches to
	apply might be doable in the short term but there _will_ come the
	day when a bug is encountered or a feature desired that was fixed or
	added as one of the parts/patches that was left out.   Best to get
	the pain over _once_ and be done with it ;)

	Cheers,
	Steven Schultz

[pups] Success!

[Christopher McNabb]

Well, here are the results of my weekends "hacking":
---------------------------
$ uname -a
2.11BSD pdp11.4mcnabb.net 2.11BSD 2.11 BSD UNIX #3: Fri Feb 21 21:00:58
PST 2003     root@:/usr/src/sys/PDP1183  pdp11

$ df
Filesystem  1K-blocks     Used    Avail Capacity  Mounted on
/dev/ra0a       10078     3009     7069    30%    /
/dev/ra0c       10078        2    10076     0%    /tmp
/dev/ra0d       90718    40963    49755    45%    /usr
/dev/ra0e       38206    29414     8792    77%    /users

$ sysctl hw
hw.machine = pdp11
hw.model = 83
hw.ncpu = 1
hw.byteorder = 3412
hw.physmem = 2097152
hw.usermem = 0
hw.pagesize = 1024

$ dmesg

Feb 25 12:02
...
<5>ra0: Ver 2 mod 3
ra0: RD54  size=311200
attaching qe0 csr 174440
qe0: DEC DEQNA addr 08:00:2b:07:b7:53
attaching lo0

phys mem  = 2097152
avail mem = 1727488
user mem  = 307200
-----------------------------------------------
The machine is an 11/83 with 2 megs of ram, DEQNA, single RD54, TSV05,
TK50, and 3 DHV11s.

Now it looks like all I have left to do is install 400 odd patches.

-- 
Christopher L McNabb              Tel:   540 231 7554
Operating Systems Analyst         Email: cmcnabb at vt.edu
Virginia Tech                     ICBM:  37.205622N 80.414595W
GMRS: WPSR255                     ARS:   N2UX  Grid Sq: EM97SD

[pups] Success!

[David Evans]

On Tue, Feb 25, 2003 at 12:05:14PM -0500, Christopher McNabb wrote:
> Well, here are the results of my weekends "hacking":

  Looks nice!

> /dev/ra0d       90718    40963    49755    45%    /usr
> /dev/ra0e       38206    29414     8792    77%    /users
> 

  I kind of wish I had done something like this; instead I ended up taking
the SGI route of /usr/people.  Oh well.

> Now it looks like all I have left to do is install 400 odd patches.
> 

  If somebody goes through this pain, any chance of making a new source kit?
Though I guess some of the patches are not necessarily desirable in all
circumstances...

-- 
David Evans          (NeXTMail/MIME OK)             dfevans at bbcr.uwaterloo.ca
Ph.D. Candidate, Computer/Synth Junkie     http://bbcr.uwaterloo.ca/~dfevans/
University of Waterloo         "Default is the value selected by the composer
Ontario, Canada           overridden by your command." - Roland TR-707 Manual