The Unix Heritage Society mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: helbig@Informatik.BA-Stuttgart.DE (Wolfgang Helbig)
Subject: [pups] V7 setjmp/longjmp
Date: Sun, 23 Mar 2003 13:32:03 +0100 (MET)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200303231233.h2NCXIg03159@bsd.korb> (raw)

>X-Unix-From: michael_davidson at pacbell.net  Tue Dec 31 17:04:50 2002
>Date: Tue, 31 Dec 2002 08:02:37 -0800
>From: Michael Davidson <michael_davidson at pacbell.net>
>User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Win 9x 4.90; en-US; rv:0.9.4) 
Gecko/20011128 Netscape6/6.2.1
>X-Accept-Language: en-us
>MIME-Version: 1.0
>To: Wolfgang Helbig <helbig at Informatik.BA-Stuttgart.DE>
>CC: pups at minnie.tuhs.org
>Subject: Re: [pups] V7 setjmp/longjmp
>Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
>
>Wolfgang Helbig wrote:

>>You can trust register variables when setjmp() returns the second time. Then
>>the registers are restored to the values they had when the "next" function was 
>>called, that is the "values as of the time longjmp() was called" (quoted from
>>longjmp(3)'s man page. Thus any variable behaves the same, regardless of its
>>storage class.
>>
>Yes, you are right - V7 restores the register variables to a state which
>is consistent with the other auto variables in the function - ie the value
>which they had when longjmp was called.
>
>The caveats about not relying on register variables applied to V6.

Nope, even in V6, register variables are restored to the values they had
when reset(III) was called! (reset() is the name of longjmp() in V6).
By the way, reset() is much smaller than longjmp() but provides the same
functionality.

I wonder why longjmp() was rewritten.

Wolfgang.




             reply	other threads:[~2003-03-23 12:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-03-23 12:32 Wolfgang Helbig [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-03-25  5:14 Dennis Ritchie
2002-12-31 11:04 Wolfgang Helbig
2002-12-31 16:02 ` Michael Davidson
2002-12-30 18:51 bwc
2002-12-31  2:23 ` Michael Davidson

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200303231233.h2NCXIg03159@bsd.korb \
    --to=helbig@informatik.ba-stuttgart.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).