From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: jkunz@unixag-kl.fh-kl.de (Jochen Kunz)
Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2003 18:58:26 +0200
Subject: [pups] 2.11BSD device config trouble
In-Reply-To: <200304301556.h3UFuwb20269@moe.2bsd.com>; from sms@2BSD.COM on Wed, Apr 30, 2003 at 17:56:58 CEST
References: <200304301556.h3UFuwb20269@moe.2bsd.com>
Message-ID: <20030430185826.R196974@MissSophie.unixag-kl.fh-kl.de>

On 2003.04.30 17:56 Steven M. Schultz wrote:

> 	Interesting.   I do not recall any particular problem getting 
> 	additional DL devices recognized (the 11/93 had 7 of them).
As already mentioned: If I add comments at the end of the lines it
works:
cn      1 176540 344    5       cnrint  cnxint  # kl/dl-11 (on mvx11-aa)
cn      2 176550 354    5       cnrint  cnxint  # kl/dl-11 (on mvx11-aa)
cn      3 176560 364    5       cnrint  cnxint  # kl/dl-11 (on mvx11-aa)
cn 1 csr 176540 vector 344 attached
cn 2 csr 176550 vector 354 attached
cn 3 csr 176560 vector 364 attached
Sounds like a funny bug? 

But if I try to use /dev/ttyl1 I get a message about a unknown interrupt
and the output of /dev/ttyl1 hangs after the first character. 

> 	If you do 
> 		nm /unix | egrep 'cnxint|cnrint' 
> 	what do you see?
# nm /unix | egrep 'cnxint|cnrint' 
007402 T _cnrint
007624 T _cnxint
000050 t cnrint
000060 t cnxint

> 	Yes, it's a little better.  Not as nice as a DHQ-11 though
I have a M3106 DZQ11 that I can use instead. 

> I forget the exact error you were getting on the DHV but if it was
> 'no interrupt' then it might be that the DHV clone is not behaving
> exactly like a DEC DHV
The DHV is a DEC M3104:
dhv ? csr 160440 vector 310 didn't interrupt.
The DL11 card is a clone made by Sigma. 

> How are you rebooting?  With the "reboot" command or by using the
> 'halt' button?   
[...]
Noticed that already. I am really not used to Unix stuff of that age.
;-) 
-- 


tschüß,
       Jochen

Homepage: http://www.unixag-kl.fh-kl.de/~jkunz/