From: kstailey@yahoo.com (Kenneth Stailey)
Subject: [TUHS] sco v. ibm
Date: Mon, 26 May 2003 19:45:58 -0700 (PDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030527024558.89482.qmail@web10001.mail.yahoo.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20030526025650.GK15770@wantadilla.lemis.com>
--- Greg 'groggy' Lehey <grog at lemis.com> wrote:
> On Friday, 23 May 2003 at 11:00:51 -0400, T.M. Sommers wrote:
> > Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote:
> >>
> >> On Thursday, 22 May 2003 at 7:54:03 -0400, Norman Wilson wrote:
> >>> I haven't come up to speed yet on SCOIBM Wars (pronounce it as you
> >>> like, but perhaps not in polite company), but even so I know enough
> >>> to ask a question: is anyone in possession of a signed, original,
> >>> genuine, non-electronic copy of the Bill Broderick letter of 23 Jan 2002
> >>> that granted a mostly free license (as long as credit given and Caldera's
> >>> name not used in vain) for 32V, V7, and predecessors?
> >>
> >> This is a question I've been asking for some time. Sadly, nobody has
> >> answered "yes". See also the message I sent yesterday: SCO have also
> >> maid claims which suggest they don't recognize the statement.
> >
> > If he was their agent, then it doesn't matter what they claim to
> > recognize now; they are bound by his statement.
>
> Yes, of course. The issue here is whether we can prove that the
> statement was made.
>
> Greg
The fact that they are not threatened by TUHS the way they are by Linux will
probably make them ignore TUHS but you never know.
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
The New Yahoo! Search - Faster. Easier. Bingo.
http://search.yahoo.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-05-27 2:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-05-22 11:54 Norman Wilson
2003-05-23 2:37 ` Greg 'groggy' Lehey
2003-05-23 15:00 ` T.M. Sommers
2003-05-26 2:56 ` Greg 'groggy' Lehey
2003-05-26 5:40 ` Christopher Vance
2003-05-27 2:45 ` Kenneth Stailey [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-05-24 18:47 Norman Wilson
2003-05-22 3:37 Ian King
2003-05-21 19:53 Phil Garcia
2003-05-21 23:09 ` Gregg C Levine
2003-05-21 23:19 ` Warren Toomey
2003-05-22 4:37 ` Greg 'groggy' Lehey
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20030527024558.89482.qmail@web10001.mail.yahoo.com \
--to=kstailey@yahoo.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).