From: mike@ducky.net (Mike Haertel)
Subject: [TUHS] SCO vs. IBM: NOVELL steps up to the plate
Date: Thu, 29 May 2003 00:49:56 -0700 (PDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200305290749.h4T7nu22092199@ducky.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200305281925.h4SJPYJ8078685@minnie.tuhs.org>
>Here's a question of interest not to the Linux community but to
>the TUHS one: if, as Novell now claim, the 1995 agreement didn't
>convey the UNIX copyrights to SCO, under what right did SCO issue
>the Ancient UNIX Source Code agreements, whether the restrictive
>version of early 1998 or the do-as-you-like Caldera letter of early
>2002? Are those agreements really valid?
You can have the right to sublicense something without owning
the copyright. You can even have the right to sublicense the
right to sublicense without owning the copyright, and so on.
It all depends on your contract with the real copyright holder.
This is probably how the contract for Novell's "sale" of Unix
to (old) SCO was written.
But only the real copyright holder can bring a legal action
against copyright violators. And judging from recent press
releases it would seem that Novell feels it is under no
contractual obligation to do so on (new) SCO's behalf.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-05-29 7:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-05-28 19:25 Norman Wilson
2003-05-28 23:24 ` Cornelius Keck
2003-05-29 0:02 ` Warren Toomey
2003-05-29 7:49 ` Mike Haertel [this message]
2003-05-29 12:16 ` Robert Tillyard
2003-05-29 12:33 ` M. Warner Losh
2003-05-29 23:50 ` Greg 'groggy' Lehey
2003-05-29 23:56 ` M. Warner Losh
2003-05-30 0:37 ` Greg 'groggy' Lehey
2003-05-30 1:01 ` Warren Toomey
2003-05-30 1:20 ` Greg 'groggy' Lehey
2003-05-29 13:18 ` Kenneth Stailey
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-06-09 14:00 Norman Wilson
2003-06-09 10:20 zmkm zmkm
2003-06-09 15:33 ` Boyd Lynn Gerber
2003-06-08 13:09 Aharon Robbins
2003-06-08 10:32 zmkm zmkm
2003-06-08 9:56 Aharon Robbins
2003-06-09 2:32 ` Kenneth Stailey
2003-05-30 9:01 Wesley Parish
2003-05-30 1:00 Norman Wilson
2003-05-28 12:11 [TUHS] SCO vs. IBM: Eric Raymond striking a blow for ... something Kenneth Stailey
2003-05-28 18:49 ` [TUHS] SCO vs. IBM: NOVELL steps up to the plate Kenneth Stailey
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200305290749.h4T7nu22092199@ducky.net \
--to=mike@ducky.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).