* [TUHS] Re: Possible Trix source tape
@ 2003-12-02 21:40 Al Kossow
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Al Kossow @ 2003-12-02 21:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
> From memory, there wasn't that much to it at the time RMS was looking at it.
what I should have said was there wasn't much done on Trix when RMS was looking
at it.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* [TUHS] Re: Possible Trix source tape
@ 2003-12-02 21:39 Al Kossow
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Al Kossow @ 2003-12-02 21:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
I should have this on one of my backup tapes. If RMS
is willing to send his tape to California, I have the
equipment to read his.
--
> It's interesting to consider what might've been if the GNU project
> hadn't got behind on the Hurd, and got up-to-speed with Trix.
--
If it wasn't tied up with Stanford licensing issues, the V Kernel would
have been a more mature system than Trix. From memory, there wasn't that
much to it at the time RMS was looking at it.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2003-12-02 21:40 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2003-12-02 21:40 [TUHS] Re: Possible Trix source tape Al Kossow
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-12-02 21:39 Al Kossow
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).