* [TUHS] 386BSD & NetBSD 0.8
@ 2004-06-08 14:35 Jason Stevens
2004-06-09 1:09 ` Warren Toomey
2004-06-12 5:37 ` Greg 'groggy' Lehey
0 siblings, 2 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Jason Stevens @ 2004-06-08 14:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
Hi, I have one question about 386BSD & NetBSD 0.8... If I'm right the reason that they were 'pulled' was because of infringing AT&T code. However didn't you need a 32v license to get access to 4.X BSD? So in that case since 32v is now public wouldn't that allow these early self hosting BSD's to be 'free' again???
Just wondering...
Jason
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://minnie.tuhs.org/pipermail/tuhs/attachments/20040608/e51bb25f/attachment.html>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* [TUHS] 386BSD & NetBSD 0.8
2004-06-08 14:35 [TUHS] 386BSD & NetBSD 0.8 Jason Stevens
@ 2004-06-09 1:09 ` Warren Toomey
2004-06-12 5:37 ` Greg 'groggy' Lehey
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Warren Toomey @ 2004-06-09 1:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
On Tue, Jun 08, 2004 at 10:35:54AM -0400, Jason Stevens wrote:
> Hi, I have one question about 386BSD & NetBSD 0.8... If I'm right the reason that they were 'pulled' was because of infringing AT&T code. However didn't you need a 32v license to get access to 4.X BSD? So in that case since 32v is now public wouldn't that allow these early self hosting BSD's to be 'free' again???
See ftp://minnie.tuhs.org/BSD which has Net/2, 386BSD 0.0 and 0.1.
Warren
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* [TUHS] 386BSD & NetBSD 0.8
2004-06-08 14:35 [TUHS] 386BSD & NetBSD 0.8 Jason Stevens
2004-06-09 1:09 ` Warren Toomey
@ 2004-06-12 5:37 ` Greg 'groggy' Lehey
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Greg 'groggy' Lehey @ 2004-06-12 5:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
[Format recovered--see http://www.lemis.com/email/email-format.html]
Single line message
On Tuesday, 8 June 2004 at 10:35:54 -0400, Jason Stevens wrote:
> Hi, I have one question about 386BSD & NetBSD 0.8... If I'm right
> the reason that they were 'pulled' was because of infringing AT&T
> code. However didn't you need a 32v license to get access to 4.X
> BSD? So in that case since 32v is now public wouldn't that allow
> these early self hosting BSD's to be 'free' again???
Yes, assuming SCO don't decide that they never released the software.
Greg
--
When replying to this message, please take care not to mutilate the
original text.
For more information, see http://www.lemis.com/email.html
Note: I discard all HTML mail unseen.
Finger grog at lemis.com for PGP public key.
See complete headers for address and phone numbers.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 187 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://minnie.tuhs.org/pipermail/tuhs/attachments/20040612/15cfb641/attachment.sig>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2004-06-12 5:37 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2004-06-08 14:35 [TUHS] 386BSD & NetBSD 0.8 Jason Stevens
2004-06-09 1:09 ` Warren Toomey
2004-06-12 5:37 ` Greg 'groggy' Lehey
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).