From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: grog@lemis.com (Greg 'groggy' Lehey) Date: Sat, 12 Jun 2004 15:07:19 +0930 Subject: [TUHS] 386BSD & NetBSD 0.8 In-Reply-To: <004401c44d65$e7aff2c0$8300a8c0@equitrac.com> References: <004401c44d65$e7aff2c0$8300a8c0@equitrac.com> Message-ID: <20040612053719.GC28581@wantadilla.lemis.com> [Format recovered--see http://www.lemis.com/email/email-format.html] Single line message On Tuesday, 8 June 2004 at 10:35:54 -0400, Jason Stevens wrote: > Hi, I have one question about 386BSD & NetBSD 0.8... If I'm right > the reason that they were 'pulled' was because of infringing AT&T > code. However didn't you need a 32v license to get access to 4.X > BSD? So in that case since 32v is now public wouldn't that allow > these early self hosting BSD's to be 'free' again??? Yes, assuming SCO don't decide that they never released the software. Greg -- When replying to this message, please take care not to mutilate the original text. For more information, see http://www.lemis.com/email.html Note: I discard all HTML mail unseen. Finger grog at lemis.com for PGP public key. See complete headers for address and phone numbers. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 187 bytes Desc: not available URL: