From: duncangareth@yahoo.co.uk (Duncan Anderson)
Subject: [TUHS] AT+T UNIX PC Information needed
Date: Sat, 18 Feb 2006 17:25:35 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200602181725.35854.duncangareth@yahoo.co.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <f79fcb134f8eefb41d6f789ef8797d96@coraid.com>
On Saturday, 18 February 2006 16:34, Brantley Coile wrote:
> The tree you're barking up has fruit. I know the schematics are
> out there. I used to have a set, but have since lost them.
>
> I've used several 7300s. The hardware was designed by convergent
> technologies. It has a wonky graphics interface because of a poor
> choice of a monitor.
>
> There should be simple power converters to give you 120v at 60 Hz.
>
> The 7300 was used as a console for some of the AT&T PBXs, so there was
> a lot of them made. They had the bigest expansion slots I have ever
> seen, going almost the entire depth of the box, which was too deep.
> Key action on the keyboard was nice. The unicomp keyboad that I now
> use has similar action.
>
> If AT&T had put some version of Unix other than System V, there might
> have been life in the old girl. The UNIX PC and the DMD terminals had
> this myopic corporate protectionism in common. I always thought that
> if the DMD5620 had been cheaper and they had had OS support for BSD as
> well as System V, the history of computing would have been very
> different. I couldn't get my boss to pay $6K for a terminal when the
> average price for a nice terminal was $1K. If he had let me buy one,
> I then would have had to port the support code. Compilers, the Mux
> communiction protocol, all the programs that ran in the terminal,
> would have had to be change to run under the non-System V system that
> we were using at the time. AT&T's decisions during the period
> displayed a persistant lack of undertanding marketing. If the
> customer came first, they would have supported the OS customers
> wanted.
As it happens, I have all the original software that came with the beastie.
I'm not sure if it's OK, but the hard drive is loaded, anyway, since a friend
had it running a BBS about 13 years ago.
I think it's System V Release 3.0 or thereabout
cheers
Duncan.
___________________________________________________________
To help you stay safe and secure online, we've developed the all new Yahoo! Security Centre. http://uk.security.yahoo.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-02-18 15:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-02-18 8:48 Duncan Anderson
2006-02-18 14:34 ` Brantley Coile
2006-02-18 15:25 ` Duncan Anderson [this message]
2006-02-18 15:32 ` Corey Lindsly
2006-02-18 20:19 ` Robert Tillyard
2006-02-18 15:44 Mike Haertel
2006-02-18 16:48 ` Michael Davidson
2006-02-20 10:03 ` Duncan Anderson
2006-02-21 3:46 Brian S Walden
2006-02-21 4:52 ` Corey Lindsly
2006-02-21 8:58 ` Duncan Anderson
2006-02-21 8:56 ` Duncan Anderson
2006-02-21 17:00 ` Sven Mascheck
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200602181725.35854.duncangareth@yahoo.co.uk \
--to=duncangareth@yahoo.co.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).