* [TUHS] TUHS Digest, Vol 31, Issue 5 [not found] <mailman.3.1147658400.31029.tuhs@minnie.tuhs.org> @ 2006-05-15 4:22 ` Larry McVoy 2006-05-15 7:46 ` Tim Bradshaw 2006-05-15 10:57 ` [TUHS] RFS (Remote? File System) (A. Wik) Berny 'Scouser' Goodheart 1 sibling, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread From: Larry McVoy @ 2006-05-15 4:22 UTC (permalink / raw) > in particular - I've seen RFS be mentioned. This was > AT&T's implementattion of transparent real-time (for > contrast with UUCP, FTP, etc.) remote file access. It wasn't real time, it was "remote file system" == RFS. It was different than NFS in that it was stateful and that it knew that the other side knew what it knew (think ioctls, yuck). My officemate worked on it, it was problematic. Don't go there. NFS is bad enough, but it works. -- --- Larry McVoy lm at bitmover.com http://www.bitkeeper.com ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* [TUHS] TUHS Digest, Vol 31, Issue 5 2006-05-15 4:22 ` [TUHS] TUHS Digest, Vol 31, Issue 5 Larry McVoy @ 2006-05-15 7:46 ` Tim Bradshaw 2006-05-15 14:02 ` Larry McVoy 0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread From: Tim Bradshaw @ 2006-05-15 7:46 UTC (permalink / raw) On 15 May 2006, at 05:22, Larry McVoy wrote: > > It wasn't real time, it was "remote file system" == RFS. > > It was different than NFS in that it was stateful and that it knew > that the > other side knew what it knew (think ioctls, yuck). My memory, which may be wrong, is that some SunOS 4s had support for it (may be all did), so there are probably manuals and so forth which can still be found there. --tim ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* [TUHS] TUHS Digest, Vol 31, Issue 5 2006-05-15 7:46 ` Tim Bradshaw @ 2006-05-15 14:02 ` Larry McVoy 0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread From: Larry McVoy @ 2006-05-15 14:02 UTC (permalink / raw) On Mon, May 15, 2006 at 08:46:33AM +0100, Tim Bradshaw wrote: > On 15 May 2006, at 05:22, Larry McVoy wrote: > > > >It wasn't real time, it was "remote file system" == RFS. > > > >It was different than NFS in that it was stateful and that it knew > >that the > >other side knew what it knew (think ioctls, yuck). > > My memory, which may be wrong, is that some SunOS 4s had support for > it (may be all did), so there are probably manuals and so forth which > can still be found there. That's correct and I have those manuals somewhere (anyone want a full set of 4.x manuals?) -- --- Larry McVoy lm at bitmover.com http://www.bitkeeper.com ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* [TUHS] RFS (Remote? File System) (A. Wik) [not found] <mailman.3.1147658400.31029.tuhs@minnie.tuhs.org> 2006-05-15 4:22 ` [TUHS] TUHS Digest, Vol 31, Issue 5 Larry McVoy @ 2006-05-15 10:57 ` Berny 'Scouser' Goodheart 1 sibling, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread From: Berny 'Scouser' Goodheart @ 2006-05-15 10:57 UTC (permalink / raw) From: "A. Wik" <aw@aw.gs> > > In the context of non-local file systems - Sun's NFS > in particular - I've seen RFS be mentioned. This was > AT&T's implementattion of transparent real-time (for > contrast with UUCP, FTP, etc.) remote file access. > > But that's all I know. Does anyone know of useful > sources of information (or just anecdotes, for that > matter)? > > -aw There's an entire section devoted to RFS in the USL SVR4 Network User's And Administrator's Guide. What is it you after Exactly? -Berny ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2006-05-15 14:02 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed) -- links below jump to the message on this page -- [not found] <mailman.3.1147658400.31029.tuhs@minnie.tuhs.org> 2006-05-15 4:22 ` [TUHS] TUHS Digest, Vol 31, Issue 5 Larry McVoy 2006-05-15 7:46 ` Tim Bradshaw 2006-05-15 14:02 ` Larry McVoy 2006-05-15 10:57 ` [TUHS] RFS (Remote? File System) (A. Wik) Berny 'Scouser' Goodheart
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).