From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: wkt@tuhs.org (Warren Toomey) Date: Sun, 4 May 2008 11:27:41 +1000 Subject: [Unix-jun72] rk03 vs rk05 In-Reply-To: References: <2901.1209825347@mini> <4998.1209837139@mini> Message-ID: <20080504012741.GA14788@minnie.tuhs.org> On Sat, May 03, 2008 at 08:16:23AM -1000, Tim Newsham wrote: > > We may not need mount afterall. The init process mounts /dev/rk0 on > > /usr during startup (after the second "1:" label on e12-01). > > Oh, for what its worth, the init sources say its an "rk05" disk ("rko5" > actually ;-) I think Warren was asking about which model to use earlier. Confusingly, the 1e manual for /dev/rk0 says its an RK03. I'll have to go read the DEC manuals, but I would guess that the RK11 drive and interface is the same, but the RK03 and RK05 removable disk packs were of different storage capacity. Warren