The Unix Heritage Society mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: wkt@tuhs.org (Warren Toomey)
Subject: [Unix-jun72] Import V1 filesystem trees into svn?
Date: Tue, 6 May 2008 12:57:44 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080506025744.GA22678@minnie.tuhs.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSI.4.64.0805051641230.20114@malasada.lava.net>

On Mon, May 05, 2008 at 04:48:46PM -1000, Tim Newsham wrote:
> > I think it would be a good idea to import the V1 / and /usr filesystem from
> > the s2 tape into the subversion repository, so that we can write a tools/
> > script to build "known good" rf0.dsk and rk1.dsk disk images.
> 
> The rf0 disk is pretty manageable.  The rk0 disk is 2.5M and might
> be a little big for putting into the SVN

Sorry Tim. I meant putting the files which will go onto the images, not
the images themselves. Plus a tools/ script to build the images.

> I think the bigger question here is what do we want the standard disk
> image to look like?  Are we building rf0 with s2/bin and s2/etc only?
> Should it have the jun72 init on it?  the jun72 sh?  A "mount" utility?
> Will there be any new versions or hacks applied?

Perhaps we do the same as we have done with patches:

	fs/root == original files as per s2 tape
	fs/usr  == original files as per s2 tape
	fs/newfiles == new files to add to images
	fs/buildroot == modified root	(not in svn)
	fs/buildusr == modified usr	(not in svn)
	tools/xxx	== script to build root and usr
 
> What about the files that mkfs can't currently put on the system due to size?

Current mkfs can write all the s2 files, including the large ones.

> What about file permissions? Are we going to restore the old s2 permissions?

We can modify mkfs to restore uid, time and V1 permissions.

> Do we want to put up prebuilt kernels?

No, just document the method to build the kernels.

> I imagine we want to have a script that autogenerates each of the
> images that we intend to put up.

I think that's the way to go: a script to build a kernel + a set of
suitable tape/disk image files for it. Make it a top-level script
that calls next-level scripts, so that we can still run tools/assemv7
if we want to build a kernel and not build a filesystem.

	Warren



  reply	other threads:[~2008-05-06  2:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-05-06  2:38 Warren Toomey
2008-05-06  2:48 ` Tim Newsham
2008-05-06  2:57   ` Warren Toomey [this message]
2008-05-06  6:53     ` Warren Toomey
2008-05-06  9:35       ` [Unix-jun72] mkfs.c modified to set correct file owner/perms Warren Toomey
2008-05-06  3:05   ` [Unix-jun72] Import V1 filesystem trees into svn? Brad Parker

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20080506025744.GA22678@minnie.tuhs.org \
    --to=wkt@tuhs.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).