From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: wkt@tuhs.org (Warren Toomey)
Date: Sun, 11 May 2008 22:28:58 +1000
Subject: [Unix-jun72] I recovered 100% of the s1 src code fragments
In-Reply-To: <1160605.1210386850465.JavaMail.root@elwamui-norfolk.atl.sa.earthlink.net>
References: <1160605.1210386850465.JavaMail.root@elwamui-norfolk.atl.sa.earthlink.net>
Message-ID: <20080511122858.GA13515@minnie.tuhs.org>

On Fri, May 09, 2008 at 10:34:10PM -0400, Doug Merritt wrote:
> FYI I recovered 100% of the s1 src code fragments; I presume this
> is of interest to y'all on this list, yes?
>
> Note that ed1.s and ed2.s are missing. Their source code simply wasn't
> in any of the fragments (which means, was not on the s1 disk image).

I just looked at 5th Edition:

-rw-r--r--  0 3      1        7998 Nov 27  1974 ./usr/source/s1/ed1.s
-rw-r--r--  0 3      1        5757 Nov 27  1974 ./usr/source/s1/ed2.s
-rw-r--r--  0 3      1        4616 Nov 27  1974 ./usr/source/s1/ed3.s

which means that we do have "ed" in assembly format, and given that Doug
found "ed3.s", we have a basis for comparison, which means we might be
able to revert 5e ed1.s and ed2.s back to what runs on the 1st Edition kernel.

	Warren