From: lm@bitmover.com (Larry McVoy)
Subject: [TUHS] How good a representative of System V is Solaris
Date: Thu, 28 May 2009 10:40:23 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090528174023.GC11928@bitmover.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <8dd2d95c0905281000w3ed4b4fdtf3ac8eea439d6234@mail.gmail.com>
I don't think there is much similarity between solaris and the old
system v. There is some in that sun was pedantic about command
line / libc / syscall compat (to their detriment in my opinion)
but much has been changed. Just start diffing.
On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 01:00:35PM -0400, Michael Kerpan wrote:
> As a long-time Linux user and a long time Unix history buff, I've been
> wanting to "play" with classic Unix variants for quite some time.
> Obviously, Research Unix up through V7 and the BSDs are readily
> available and I've at least mucked around with them, but post-V7 AT&T
> Unices have always been unavailable, at least at any price that I can
> afford on my college student budget. Solaris, however, at least
> started out as an implementation of SVR4 and is freely available. How
> much of System V still lurks inside Solaris 10 (the last version to
> include such traditional workstation elements as CDE and DPS in the X
> server) and how much has been removed in favor of a more GNU-ish
> userland experience? Is Solaris a good way to get a System V
> experience without breaking either the bank or copyright law, or is
> this a hopeless situation?
>
> Mike
> _______________________________________________
> TUHS mailing list
> TUHS at minnie.tuhs.org
> https://minnie.tuhs.org/mailman/listinfo/tuhs
--
---
Larry McVoy lm at bitmover.com http://www.bitkeeper.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-05-28 17:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-05-28 17:00 Michael Kerpan
2009-05-28 17:40 ` Larry McVoy [this message]
2009-05-29 8:34 ` Tim Bradshaw
2009-05-29 12:12 A P Garcia
2009-05-29 13:08 ` Tim Bradshaw
2009-05-29 13:32 ` Brantley Coile
2009-05-30 0:20 ` Michael Kerpan
2009-05-30 1:51 ` Jason Stevens
2009-05-30 9:10 ` Wesley Parish
2009-05-30 2:15 ` Jason Stevens
2009-05-30 13:47 Pepe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090528174023.GC11928@bitmover.com \
--to=lm@bitmover.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).