From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: wes.parish@paradise.net.nz (Wesley Parish) Date: Sat, 30 May 2009 21:10:36 +1200 Subject: [TUHS] How good a representative of System V is Solaris In-Reply-To: <46b366130905291851j4d96b94dq1239ccfde890ad7e@mail.gmail.com> References: <8dd2d95c0905291720q769c53acn66b0235b810bba28@mail.gmail.com> <46b366130905291851j4d96b94dq1239ccfde890ad7e@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <200905302110.37375.wes.parish@paradise.net.nz> FWIW, I did ask Novell a year or so ago about releasing OSF/1 from the SysVRx license requirement; I sent them a reminder, together with the request that they consider giving TUHS an SysVRx source/binary license. So far they haven't responded. Maybe I should get onto the local branch and ask them to take it up with headquarters ... :) Wesley Parish On Saturday 30 May 2009 13:51, Jason Stevens wrote: > I'm trying to get something out of Novell on this... so far they keep > on wanting to sell me Linux they seem perplexed about their ownership > of any UNIX ip, even when I point them to their own pages proclaiming > such....... > > On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 8:20 PM, Michael Kerpan wrote: > > So far, it seems that the consensus is that Solaris isn't a good > > representative of System V... With that said, the second part of my > > question still remains: is there a way to pay with a classic System V > > environment that is both free/cheap AND legal or am I SOL? > > > > Mike > > _______________________________________________ > > TUHS mailing list > > TUHS at minnie.tuhs.org > > https://minnie.tuhs.org/mailman/listinfo/tuhs > > _______________________________________________ > TUHS mailing list > TUHS at minnie.tuhs.org > https://minnie.tuhs.org/mailman/listinfo/tuhs -- Clinersterton beademung, with all of love - RIP James Blish ----- Are couch potatoes good to eat? ----- Mau e ki, he aha te mea nui? You ask, what is the most important thing? Maku e ki, he tangata, he tangata, he tangata. I reply, it is people, it is people, it is people.