From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: brad@anduin.eldar.org (Brad Spencer) Date: Thu, 28 Jan 2010 15:27:11 -0500 (EST) Subject: [TUHS] Backup software (was: Irwin 285) In-Reply-To: <20100122003610.GB3623@dereel.lemis.com> (grog@lemis.com) References: <20100121203655.GH25687@freebie.xs4all.nl> <20100121204449.92D7640E8@lod.com> <20100122003610.GB3623@dereel.lemis.com> Message-ID: <201001282027.o0SKRBIs001465@anduin.eldar.org> On Thursday, 21 January 2010 at 12:44:49 -0800, Corey Lindsly wrote: > >> Sure. I know. Big SATA drives are cheap over here as well, like >> 1.5T for 110 EURO or somesuch. I just happen to own a LTO3 and >> enough tapes already, so the economics are not the issue. Just need >> to have a proper piece of open source backup software that runs on >> FreeBSD. > > And what, precisely, is the problem with using dump? > It will span multiple tapes. dump is non-portable. In general, you can only restore to the same kind of system as you write to. Greg -- Finger grog at FreeBSD.org for PGP public key. See complete headers for address and phone numbers. This message is digitally signed. If your Microsoft MUA reports problems, please read http://tinyurl.com/broken-mua Not entirely true... dump and restore in NetBSD seems to be portable among NetBSD systems at least. I have personally restored to NetBSD/sparc from NetBSD/alpha, a 64 bit to 32 bit conversion. I have also restored to NetBSD/amd64 a NetBSD/i386 dump, which is basically the other way around. I have also read NetBSD/sparc dumps on NetBSD/i386, and it worked fine, that would have been a byte order conversion. I don't know how far this goes, if it is just NetBSD, or something inherent to all 4.4BSD derived systems. -- Brad Spencer - brad at anduin.eldar.org - KC8VKS http://anduin.eldar.org - & - http://anduin.ipv6.eldar.org [IPv6 only] _______________________________________________ TUHS mailing list TUHS at minnie.tuhs.org https://minnie.tuhs.org/mailman/listinfo/tuhs