From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: grog@lemis.com (Greg 'groggy' Lehey) Date: Sun, 7 Mar 2010 17:02:16 +1100 Subject: [TUHS] More versions in the tree (was: Unix Tree: side scrolling) In-Reply-To: <20100307051407.GB24920@bitmover.com> References: <20100301043756.GA23969@minnie.tuhs.org> <4B926635.5030102@laposte.net> <20100307021407.GA18028@minnie.tuhs.org> <20100307051407.GB24920@bitmover.com> Message-ID: <20100307060216.GE98136@dereel.lemis.com> On Saturday, 6 March 2010 at 21:14:08 -0800, Larry McVoy wrote: >> I also want to add these other releases: >> 4BSD >> 4.1BSD which one? > > 4.1c was the one that worked, right? Well, it's interesting as the first operating system with support for TCP/IP, so I'd vote for that too. >> I still seriously want to get a copy of SysVR4.2, which will go ... > > SysVR4.2 was never my favorite. System V in general was a poor > excuse for a Unix release. Heh. All the more reason to have a representative of the branch, so that people can see for themselves. > We still have SCO running here and it's pretty close to Sys V Possibly it would look that way revisited now. It certainly didn't to us 20 years ago. We were running, well, System V.2, and we wanted a UNIX for our PCs. We ended up with Interactive, which was a whole lot better than SCO. Greg -- Finger grog at FreeBSD.org for PGP public key. See complete headers for address and phone numbers. This message is digitally signed. If your Microsoft MUA reports problems, please read http://tinyurl.com/broken-mua -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 195 bytes Desc: not available URL: -------------- next part -------------- _______________________________________________ TUHS mailing list TUHS at minnie.tuhs.org https://minnie.tuhs.org/mailman/listinfo/tuhs