From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: lm@bitmover.com (Larry McVoy) Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2010 14:34:41 -0700 Subject: [TUHS] 2.11BSD cross compiler In-Reply-To: <20100929205442.GA2858@server.vk2pj.dyndns.org> References: <20100929005148.GA8032@bitmover.com> <20100929023819.GA12919@bitmover.com> <20100929035534.GE12919@bitmover.com> <20100929205442.GA2858@server.vk2pj.dyndns.org> Message-ID: <20100929213441.GE32130@bitmover.com> On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 06:54:42AM +1000, Peter Jeremy wrote: > On 2010-Sep-28 20:55:34 -0700, Larry McVoy wrote: > >On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 05:17:33AM +0200, Steve Nickolas wrote: > >> Dunno, the only instruction set I really grok is 65C02, which is by your > >> standards probably little more than a toy. > > > >Oh, no. Useful. There was similar Intel (i think) cpu that was flashable. > > Maybe 8748. There was a mask version of this in the PC keyboard > controller (and hence still buried in most if not all southbridges). > That was followed by the 8051 family (8751 would have been the EPROM > version) - which I believe was very popular in car ECUs. It was also I think it was a variant of the 8051 that had EPROM and 3 UARTs. Because I needed 3 - one for the long line to the CS building, and 2 for the 2 terminals. -- --- Larry McVoy lm at bitmover.com http://www.bitkeeper.com