From: lm@bitmover.com (Larry McVoy)
Subject: [TUHS] curmudgeon credit
Date: Sun, 28 Apr 2013 09:28:44 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130428162844.GB1001@bitmover.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201304280534.r3S5YrSu002857@skeeve.com>
On Sun, Apr 28, 2013 at 08:34:53AM +0300, Aharon Robbins wrote:
> > What I'd like is a new 64 bit PDP-11. That assembler was wonderful to
> > read and write, only a short distance from C.
>
> True.
> IF you are not writing the compiler or the low level OS routines, what
> freaking difference does it make?
We build source management systems and we still drop into assembler for
some stuff. For example, we want to give ourselves a stack traceback
when something dies. Another example is inner loops that are performance
critical, we stare at the assembler.
I don't expect the world to suddenly sit up and decide that it is important
to do what I want and give me my 64 bit PDP-11, but if that happened I'd
cheer :)
I think part of it is a yearning for simpler times. That architecture
was just so pleasant, you could move quite easily from C to assembler
and back again. If I had to teach CS these days I'd prefer that
assembler (but actually using it would be a disservice to the kids,
you want them to know x86 or ARM at this point).
--
---
Larry McVoy lm at bitmover.com http://www.bitkeeper.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-04-28 16:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-04-27 21:26 [TUHS] Need a new PDP-11 or VAX? Dave Horsfall
2013-04-27 22:41 ` Larry McVoy
2013-04-27 23:53 ` Dave Horsfall
2013-04-28 0:12 ` Ronald Natalie
2013-04-28 1:39 ` John Cowan
2013-04-28 3:38 ` Nick Downing
2013-04-28 3:48 ` Larry McVoy
2013-04-28 3:57 ` Larry McVoy
2013-04-28 5:57 ` John Cowan
2013-04-28 5:34 ` [TUHS] curmudgeon credit Aharon Robbins
2013-04-28 7:08 ` Nick Downing
2013-05-14 6:11 ` Aaron J. Grier
2013-05-14 6:52 ` emu
2013-05-14 7:51 ` David Evans
2013-04-28 16:28 ` Larry McVoy [this message]
2013-04-28 7:45 ` [TUHS] Need a new PDP-11 or VAX? Peter Jeremy
2013-04-28 10:50 ` Ronald Natalie
2013-04-28 0:15 ` Ronald Natalie
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130428162844.GB1001@bitmover.com \
--to=lm@bitmover.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).