From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: grog@lemis.com (Greg 'groggy' Lehey) Date: Mon, 2 Jun 2014 13:17:15 +1000 Subject: [TUHS] Gnu/Stallman (was Bugs in V6 'dcheck') In-Reply-To: <00668C2D-BF21-44EA-A7D8-A9530CA24551@bsdimp.com> References: <201406020209.s5229Q5o006174@stowe.cs.dartmouth.edu> <00668C2D-BF21-44EA-A7D8-A9530CA24551@bsdimp.com> Message-ID: <20140602031715.GA27136@eureka.lemis.com> On Sunday, 1 June 2014 at 20:59:13 -0600, Warner Losh wrote: > > On Jun 1, 2014, at 8:09 PM, Doug McIlroy wrote: > >> Phil Garcia wrote: >> I've always wondered about something >> else, though: Were the original Unix authors annoyed when they learned that >> some irascible young upstart named Richard Stallman was determined to make >> a free Unix clone? Was he a gadfly, or just some kook you decided to >> ignore? The fathers of Unix have been strangely silent on this topic for >> many years. Maybe nobody's ever asked? > > In private moments, some of the BSD old-timers have told me they are > silent due to bad blood that Stallman?s early fund-raising and > propaganda efforts created. Why rehash 20 year old battles with an > obvious nutcase, eh? Since more than one person has told me this, so > I think silence is a wide-spread case of ?If you can?t say anything > nice, say nothing at all." But now you've said something, and it's not nice. Clearly this is indicative of the standpoints of the others as well. A lot is simply personality conflict. As you know, I don't share that opinion, and I think the emphasis that FreeBSD places on ridding itself of GNU software is unhealthy. Yes, rms is "unusual", but that goes for a lot of the BSD crowd too. And I know enough people in the Linux space who dislike him as well. >> Gnu was always taken as a compliment. And of course the Unix clone >> was pie in the sky until Linus came along. I wonder about the power >> relationship underlying "GNU/Linux", as rms modestly styles it. > > Of course, it should be noted that the GNU project was totally > incapable of producing a working kernel? They did decent clones of > user land stuff, but Hurd was a total dead end... But if you state that, you need to analyse why. I think the big issue was the grandiose goals that they set. And who knows what might have happened if Linux and the free BSDs hadn't come along? I don't think it's fair to simply dismiss it as a dead end. >> There are certain differences in taste between Unix and Gnu, vide >> emacs and texinfo... > > Emacs is awesome?. Not part of my vocabulary, but I couldn't live without Emacs. Shall we degrade this discussion into a vi/Emacs fight? Greg -- Sent from my desktop computer. Finger grog at FreeBSD.org for PGP public key. See complete headers for address and phone numbers. This message is digitally signed. If your Microsoft MUA reports problems, please read http://tinyurl.com/broken-mua -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 196 bytes Desc: not available URL: