The Unix Heritage Society mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: norman@oclsc.org (Norman Wilson)
Subject: [TUHS] First Unix that could run on a PDP-11 with QBUS
Date: Sun, 27 Jul 2014 01:39:36 -0400 (EDT)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140727053936.4AAB91DE381@lignose.oclsc.org> (raw)

Many Q-bus devices were indeed programmed exactly as if
on a UNIBUS.  This isn't surprising: Digital wanted their
own operating systems to port easily as well.

That won't help make UNIX run on a Pro-350 or Pro-380,
though.  Those systems had standard single-chip PDP-11
CPUs (F11, like that in the 11/23, for the 350; J11,
like that in the 11/73, for the 380), but they didn't
have a Q-bus; they used the CTI (`computing terminal
interconnect'), a bus used only for the Pro-series
systems.  DEC's operating systems wouldn't run on
the Pro either without special hacks.  I think the
P/OS, the standard OS shipped with those systems, was
a hacked-up RSX-11M.  I don't know whether there was
ever an RT-11 for the Pro.  There were UNIX ports but
they weren't just copies of stock V7.

I vaguely remember, from my days at Caltech > 30 years
ago, helping someone get a locally-hacked-up V7
running on an 11/24, the same as an 11/23 except is
has a UNIBUS instead of a Q-bus.  I don't think they
chose the 11/24 over the 11/23 to make it easier to
get UNIX running; probably it had something to do with
specific peripherals they wanted to use.  It was a
long time ago and I didn't keep notebooks back then,
so the details may be unrecoverable.

Norman Wilson
Toronto ON



             reply	other threads:[~2014-07-27  5:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-07-27  5:39 Norman Wilson [this message]
2014-07-27  6:02 ` John Cowan
2014-07-27 14:10   ` Bill Pechter
2014-07-27 17:16     ` Dave Horsfall
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2014-07-28 13:27 Noel Chiappa
2014-07-28 22:23 ` Dave Horsfall
2014-07-29  9:46   ` Warren Toomey
2014-07-29  9:56   ` Dave Horsfall
2014-07-29 14:33     ` Clem Cole
2014-07-29 13:10   ` Milo Velimirović
2014-07-27  3:26 Noel Chiappa
2014-07-27  5:49 ` Dave Horsfall
2014-07-28 22:04   ` Warren Toomey
2014-07-28 22:38     ` Warner Losh
2014-07-29  9:06       ` SPC
2014-07-29 13:28     ` Clem Cole
2014-07-27  2:37 Mark Longridge
2014-07-28 15:57 ` Ron Natalie

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20140727053936.4AAB91DE381@lignose.oclsc.org \
    --to=norman@oclsc.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).