From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: dfawcus+lists-tuhs@employees.org (Derek Fawcus)
Date: Sun, 13 Sep 2015 13:13:59 +0100
Subject: [TUHS] Did realloc ever zero the new memory?
In-Reply-To: <1Zb1NA-5he-00@marmaro.de>
References: <201509130032.t8D0WvPl024634@tahoe.cs.Dartmouth.EDU>
 <20150913011501.GF2103@mcvoy.com> <1Zb1NA-5he-00@marmaro.de>
Message-ID: <20150913121359.GA96351@cowbell.employees.org>

On Sun, Sep 13, 2015 at 09:06:48AM +0200, markus schnalke wrote:
> Please note, that identifiers are usually remembered by sound
> not by letter sequence. `zalloc' and `zealloc' are likely to
> be pronounced similar

While I'd pronounce zealloc as Zee-alloc;  I'd not be inclined
to pronounce zalloc that way,  nor as Zed-alloc, but as Zal-loc
(rhymes with Sal-loc).  Maybe Larry had this pronounciation
in mind?

Similarly,  I pronounce 'calloc' as Kal-loc not, See-alloc.

So other folk from England should have no trouble :-)

DF