From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: lehmann@ans-netz.de (Oliver Lehmann)
Date: Sun, 08 Nov 2015 14:38:17 +0100
Subject: [TUHS] System III - TCP/IP
In-Reply-To: <CAH1jEzbzpuwzncuEFQMHHD-pHHk_4SHre2PY5BPZNpY_HAgXCw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <20151107200358.Horde.M1lYZZyTC4t0Qb8KrygKzhy@avocado.salatschuessel.net>
 <20151107192043.GA11895@mcvoy.com>
 <CAC20D2NnLC2H=+8ZzpXEpgUqa+qW3JuFMLeWjL_Su9OBoHWBZQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <20151107231338.Horde.d8EIgIMMf9VYCExfovc2K_M@avocado.salatschuessel.net>
 <20151108051028.GA32246@cowbell.employees.org>
 <CAH1jEzbzpuwzncuEFQMHHD-pHHk_4SHre2PY5BPZNpY_HAgXCw@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <20151108143817.Horde.tlWgdF0OWmzmg-kXXO-AxUO@avocado.salatschuessel.net>


Nick Downing <downing.nick at gmail.com> wrote:

> I think you might get better mileage by just trying to port 2.11BSD over to
> your Z8001 device, since it is a self contained system, no interface
> hacking will be needed, just porting.

By the way - why do you think 2.11 BSD would be better to port instead of the
original 4.3 BSD? The system has no 64KB addressing limitation. It can adress
up to 128 64KB segments (=8MB). I mean, on a first look, it looks like 2.11BSD
contains a lot more Assembler Code I would need to move to Z8001 ASM mnemonics
as 4.3 does?!