From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: lm@mcvoy.com (Larry McVoy)
Date: Tue, 22 Dec 2015 20:53:41 -0800
Subject: [TUHS] etymology of cron
In-Reply-To: <20151223014407.07322440AE@lignose.oclsc.org>
References: <20151223014407.07322440AE@lignose.oclsc.org>
Message-ID: <20151223045341.GC1873@mcvoy.com>

As a guy who has donated money to Wikipedia this whole thread makes
me not want to donate again.  Just me being grumpy.

On Tue, Dec 22, 2015 at 08:44:07PM -0500, Norman Wilson wrote:
> Perhaps Wikipedia would be satisfied if we could get
> Ken to write a letter to some current published journal,
> saying that he's the one who named cron, he's heard
> people are interested in how it got that name, here's
> how.  We could then cite that as a reference.
> 
> On the other hand, this may be an example of the
> degree to which one should trust Wikipedia.  The
> `command run on notice' acronym claim is backed up
> by an article from the AUUG (Hi Warren!) Proceedings,
> 1994, in which the first reference to cron gives
> that explanation with no further reference.
> 
> If that's the quality of reference they accept, there
> is simply no reason to take anything they publish
> as gospel.  Sorry.
> 
> Norman Wilson
> Toronto ON
> 
> Proud that no one has yet made a spurious Wikipedia
> page asserting the etymology of my personal domain
> name.

-- 
---
Larry McVoy            	     lm at mcvoy.com             http://www.mcvoy.com/lm