[TUHS] v6 debugging

[jnc@mercury.lcs.mit.edu (Noel Chiappa)]

    > From: Will Senn

    > How did folks debug assembly routines in Unix v6, back in the day?

There are three different questions here, although you may not realize it:

 - How did folks debug assembly routines in user programs in Unix v6
 - How did folks debug assembly routines in the kernel in Unix v6
 - How did folks debug assembly routines in PDP-11 standalone code created
   with Unix v6

I did all three, and I used different methods for each.

For user code, there was no source-level debugger, so debugging C programs
and debugging code written in assembler were the same thing. I used 'adb'
(which is, stricly speaking, slightly post-V6 - our system at MIT was
actually sort of an early PWB clone), but V6 itself provides 'db' (and also,
IIRC, 'cdb'); all three are very similar.

For standalone code (in my case, a packet switch that ran on PDP-11's), I
used a version of DDT that was linked in with the rest of the code. The
original version was one in MACRO-11 which I inherited from Jim Mathis at
SRI, but I eventually re-wrote it in portable C, and it was used on the 68K,
uVax and 29K.

For kernel assembler code... I can't remember what I did! Although I wrote a
fair amount of it (I modified m45.s very extensively, to work with the Able
ENABLE card), so I must have done _something_, but I have no idea what. In
theory I could have linked DDT in with the kernel, but I don't think I ever
did so?

Recently I was debugging some kernel code (the splice() system call we were
discussing here), and I debugged it using... printf()'s! It was written in C,
but I don't really differentiate between debugging C code, and assembler.


    > 2. No map file created by ld.

LD normally includes a symbol table in the output file, which 'nm' can dump.

    > 3. No debugger that I can find.

See above.

    > My workarounds include using OD to view the generated machine code

Use db/cdb/adb if you want to look at compiled code. Also, for 'cc', use the
-S flag.

	Noel