From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: grog@lemis.com (Greg 'groggy' Lehey) Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2016 08:49:43 +1100 Subject: [TUHS] Character sets In-Reply-To: <56F7C85F.6060503@update.uu.se> References: <56F7B14A.7040201@update.uu.se> <20160327112920.GH12921@mercury.ccil.org> <56F7C85F.6060503@update.uu.se> Message-ID: <20160327214943.GS3766@eureka.lemis.com> On Sunday, 27 March 2016 at 13:47:43 +0200, Johnny Billquist wrote: > On 2016-03-27 13:29, John Cowan wrote: >> Johnny Billquist scripsit: >> >>> On 2016-03-27 08:18, Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote: >>>> Isn't it wonderful that we no longer have issues with character >>>> representation? >>> >>> I hope that comment was meant as a joke, ironic, cynical, or whatever... >> >> Undoubtedly. But things *are* much better than they used to be: >> we can now do everything within a single character set, and convert >> only at the boundaries (and increasingly, only in one direction). > > Haha. Yes... Except that you now have multiple representations of each > character within one character set. So what has improved??? In the Good Old Days, characters were all the same size, and you could do nice, simple things like while (*c && *c++ != " "); Now you need a whole library to do the same thing. Greg -- Sent from my desktop computer. Finger grog at FreeBSD.org for PGP public key. See complete headers for address and phone numbers. This message is digitally signed. If your Microsoft MUA reports problems, please read http://tinyurl.com/broken-mua -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 181 bytes Desc: not available URL: