From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: cowan@mercury.ccil.org (John Cowan)
Date: Thu, 7 Jul 2016 10:11:31 -0400
Subject: [TUHS] Slashes (was: MS-DOS)
In-Reply-To: <CAJfiPzxSvYj=H5Gz+D6mgVU-K19JKX5yetpA0h9enEGTnCGmOw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <1467418363.24560.for-standards-violators@oclsc.org>
 <alpine.BSF.2.02.1607012112200.18366@frieza.hoshinet.org>
 <20160707050242.GD78278@eureka.lemis.com>
 <CAJfiPzxSvYj=H5Gz+D6mgVU-K19JKX5yetpA0h9enEGTnCGmOw@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <20160707141130.GA19493@mercury.ccil.org>

Nemo scripsit:

> I would argue "solidus" is closer.

A solid argument, worth at least a shilling.

-- 
John Cowan          http://www.ccil.org/~cowan        cowan at ccil.org
It's like if you meet an really old, really rich guy covered in liver
spots and breathing with an oxygen tank, and you say, "I want to be
rich, too, so I'm going to start walking with a cane and I'm going to
act crotchety and I'm going to get liver disease. --Wil Shipley