From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: michael@kjorling.se (Michael =?utf-8?B?S2rDtnJsaW5n?=) Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2017 09:56:13 +0000 Subject: [TUHS] Mach for i386 / Mt Xinu or other In-Reply-To: <4652e32b-d39d-480f-8adf-6f84934bfb79@SG2APC01FT046.eop-APC01.prod.protection.outlook.com> References: <1ba0f584-6478-4332-bcae-63ac6cedf2f6@SG2APC01FT041.eop-APC01.prod.protection.outlook.com> <20170219154432.GA19243@mcvoy.com> <58ab3214.+jRaJEWVki5gYHFz%schily@schily.net> <20170220222457.GB3163@mcvoy.com> <58ac16ca.V0zEZijwK0rh0Cyr%schily@schily.net> <20170221213754.GA6103@mcvoy.com> <4652e32b-d39d-480f-8adf-6f84934bfb79@SG2APC01FT046.eop-APC01.prod.protection.outlook.com> Message-ID: <20170222095613.GB14469@yeono.kjorling.se> On 22 Feb 2017 16:57 +0800, from jsteve at superglobalmegacorp.com: > My personal catastrophic issues with Linux has always been > the ‘hookers and blackjack’ approach, where someone doesn’t like > LIBC then they’ll just replace it, over and over and over. Then you > get binary commercial products (Oracle) which are a nightmare to > deal with, and now you end up with containers as a way to deal with > the horrible impossibility of deploying binaries to Linux. I’m still > hopeful someone will just “borrow” what NeXT did with packages, and > fat binaries. Something like _snaps_, which Ubuntu is apparently pushing in their most recent releases? What is a snap? https://snapcraft.io/docs/snaps/intro Can a vanilla Ubuntu 16.04 LTS Server run without snapd? https://askubuntu.com/q/878431/11751 -- Michael Kjörling • https://michael.kjorling.se • michael at kjorling.se “People who think they know everything really annoy those of us who know we don’t.” (Bjarne Stroustrup)