From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: pepe@naleco.com (Josh Good) Date: Sun, 26 Feb 2017 11:50:00 +0100 Subject: [TUHS] Sun NFS version 2.0 In-Reply-To: <20170224205731.GA14701@minnie.tuhs.org> References: <20170221120218.E07BA18C10B@mercury.lcs.mit.edu> <20170221164728.GZ20341@mcvoy.com> <20170221192124.GO20341@mcvoy.com> <20170221203256.GF3250@mcvoy.com> <1487717888.58acc60090241@www.paradise.net.nz> <20170224205731.GA14701@minnie.tuhs.org> Message-ID: <20170226104958.GA15670@naleco.com> On 2017 Feb 25, 06:57, Warren Toomey wrote: > > I eyeballed it against the 4.3BSD from UWisc that is in the archive already. > It looks like the UWisc code is either a later version or a modified version > of this NFSv2 code. Therefore, I think it's safe to put the original NFSv2 > code into the archive. > > It's at http://www.tuhs.org/Archive/Distributions/Sun/ > > I'll add it and the early networking code to the Unix Tree soon. > > Thanks Arthur! > Warren Hi, Warren. Perhaps it's because of the ancient version of GnuPG that I am running, but your PGP-signed message I'm replying to does not verify with your public key you have published here: http://minnie.tuhs.org/warren.html I get this output from my GnuPG install: --------------------------------------- gpg: Signature made Fri Feb 24 21:57:31 2017 CET gpg: using RSA key 0xAC26979D28FF474E gpg: Can't check signature: public key not found --------------------------------------- I must be doing something wrong, I suppose. -- Josh Good