From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: michael@kjorling.se (Michael =?utf-8?B?S2rDtnJsaW5n?=) Date: Sun, 26 Feb 2017 12:46:57 +0000 Subject: [TUHS] The size of EMACS, and what hides in kLOCs In-Reply-To: <20170226123956.DBD3C18C088@mercury.lcs.mit.edu> References: <20170226123956.DBD3C18C088@mercury.lcs.mit.edu> Message-ID: <20170226124657.GB21079@yeono.kjorling.se> On 26 Feb 2017 07:39 -0500, from jnc at mercury.lcs.mit.edu (Noel Chiappa): > I was never happy with the size of EMACS, and it had nothing to do with the > amount of memory resources used. That big a binary implies a very large amount > of source, and the more lines of code, the more places for bugs... But remember; without Emacs, we might never have had _The Cuckoo's Egg_. Imagine the terror of that loss. Or not. (Though Stoll's book was one of the things that more or less introduced me to the idea of operating systems other than DOS/Windows. I don't remember how many times I borrowed that book from the local library, but it was probably in the double digits at least. Later I got my own copy, which I still have.) -- Michael Kjörling • https://michael.kjorling.se • michael at kjorling.se “People who think they know everything really annoy those of us who know we don’t.” (Bjarne Stroustrup)