From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: lm@mcvoy.com (Larry McVoy)
Date: Sun, 26 Feb 2017 11:33:49 -0800
Subject: [TUHS] roff
In-Reply-To: <CAHfSdrV13J5Gr69NtT_Hv7VpiqkRehQT=F_cYxwP0M54iYHa6w@mail.gmail.com>
References: <20170226123956.DBD3C18C088@mercury.lcs.mit.edu>
 <BA1995BD-B9D1-4F88-9690-45B36CE59347@tfeb.org>
 <CAHfSdrUsMzu-KB6fFGp9XeZbr5ecxvnEPzGS-CQ+jRQqGuFDGg@mail.gmail.com>
 <00a701d29053$e13f40f0$a3bdc2d0$@ronnatalie.com>
 <20170226172011.GC21831@yeono.kjorling.se>
 <alpine.BSF.2.02.1702261232310.26193@frieza.hoshinet.org>
 <CAHfSdrV13J5Gr69NtT_Hv7VpiqkRehQT=F_cYxwP0M54iYHa6w@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <20170226193349.GA24397@mcvoy.com>

On Sun, Feb 26, 2017 at 12:39:54PM -0500, Michael Kerpan wrote:
> Personally, I'd like to see something using the Heirloom Tools userspace.
> Heirloom *roff, in particular, is miles ahead of GNU (especially when
> dealing with fonts) while also being much lighter weight. 

What's better about the old roff?  The new roff has some pic enhancements
that I like.  I suspect the old roff includes grap, be nice to have that.