From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: wkt@tuhs.org (Warren Toomey) Date: Tue, 7 Mar 2017 08:19:49 +1000 Subject: [TUHS] Source code abundance? In-Reply-To: <20170306201744.GU16343@mcvoy.com> References: <23bbfb06-2de6-a9e1-0786-3f46d17c1192@kilonet.net> <20170306153317.GA23881@indra.papnet.eu> <20170306193613.GA18673@minnie.tuhs.org> <20170306201744.GU16343@mcvoy.com> Message-ID: <20170306221949.GA32247@minnie.tuhs.org> > On Tue, Mar 07, 2017 at 05:36:13AM +1000, Warren Toomey wrote: > > Eric Raymond wrote a comparison tool. So did I: > > http://minnie.tuhs.org/Programs/Ctcompare/index.html On Mon, Mar 06, 2017 at 12:17:44PM -0800, Larry McVoy wrote: > So have you ever run that on, say, any of the BSDs claimed to be free > of AT&T code, vs 32v or V7 or some other pre-dating-free version and > summarized all the files/routines that were identical? [ I answered Larry by private mail too early this morning, and interpreted his question incorrectly. I'm awake now. ] There was slightly more 32V code in Net/2 that the UCB folk had found, but this was still negligible and could easily have been rewritten. The list of results is at: http://minnie.tuhs.org/Programs/Ctcompare/Ctf/32Vkern_vs_Net2kern.txt Warren -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 819 bytes Desc: not available URL: