From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: lm@mcvoy.com (Larry McVoy) Date: Tue, 7 Mar 2017 07:28:51 -0800 Subject: [TUHS] Source code abundance? In-Reply-To: <00f001d29755$62245bd0$266d1370$@ronnatalie.com> References: <23bbfb06-2de6-a9e1-0786-3f46d17c1192@kilonet.net> <20170306153317.GA23881@indra.papnet.eu> <005c01d29699$10330ef0$30992cd0$@ronnatalie.com> <00e101d29754$8e61b220$ab251660$@ronnatalie.com> <00f001d29755$62245bd0$266d1370$@ronnatalie.com> Message-ID: <20170307152851.GA16946@mcvoy.com> On Tue, Mar 07, 2017 at 10:13:31AM -0500, Ron Natalie wrote: > For most of the time in my UNIX career, I was working either for the > University or the US Army, so I never had any claim on my code. It went > out on various distributions, and I didn't think much about it. Every once > and a while I'd be surprised when I came across my code in some deployed > system (of all things the NeXT box, for example). Personally, so long as it wasn't garbage code, I've always been sort of stoked to stumble across my code in strange places. It's fun to think that people found it useful. There was a period of time, not sure if it is true now or not, that my rewrite of dd(1) was in use at all the disk drive companies. It has a lot of tweaks in it for benchmarking, it can do random iops, report bandwidth or latency, write a known pattern, verify the pattern, etc. Nothing earth shattering but useful enough that when I talked to people working on drives they'd mention it when we were talking about performance stuff. Neat. -- --- Larry McVoy lm at mcvoy.com http://www.mcvoy.com/lm