From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: khm@sciops.net (Kurt H Maier)
Date: Mon, 24 Apr 2017 17:24:57 -0700
Subject: [TUHS] There is turmoil in Linux-land - When did rm first avoid
 going upwards?
In-Reply-To: <CAP6exYJrMZwFEMG0FP3W1vhUgoGC2y7RDaDajrh45xS=gNGwzA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <20170424220603.883CB18C0D0@mercury.lcs.mit.edu>
 <20170424221840.GB4966@naleco.com> <20170424232328.GB27654@wopr>
 <05b101d2bd57$cb86f6f0$6294e4d0$@ronnatalie.com>
 <20170425001829.GC27654@wopr>
 <CAP6exYJrMZwFEMG0FP3W1vhUgoGC2y7RDaDajrh45xS=gNGwzA@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <20170425002457.GD27654@wopr>

On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 12:22:44AM +0000, ron minnich wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 24, 2017 at 5:18 PM Kurt H Maier <khm at sciops.net> wrote:
> 
> >
> >
> > And systemd is now catching up.  "Those who do not study unix" etc
> >
> >
> 
> not catching up, as I read the discussion it is marked as "working as
> intended".


They committed a patch to fix it.  The project maintainer declared it a
non-problem ex post facto and met with some derision... but by that
point they at least had a safeguard in place.

khm