From: lm@mcvoy.com (Larry McVoy)
Subject: [TUHS] C declarations.
Date: Thu, 11 May 2017 15:32:32 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170511223232.GM4341@mcvoy.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <68E8DC0A-D1B8-4FF0-AD26-ACDC57E308AF@pobox.com>
On Fri, May 12, 2017 at 08:03:28AM +1000, David Arnold wrote:
> > On 12 May 2017, at 07:49, Ron Natalie <ron at ronnatalie.com> wrote:
> >
> > <???>
> > But if we're going to gripe about the evolution of C. My biggest gripe is when they fixed structs to be real types, they didn't also do so for arrays.
> > Arrays and their degeneration to poitners is one of the biggest annoyances in C.
>
> And, conversely (perversely?) one of its greatest joys.
I dunno if it is one of its greatest joys but pointers in C have always
made sense to me.
I'm curious as to what is busted about arrays in C? To me they just
seemed like a way to define how to look at a wad of memory and they
seem to work for me. About the only thing I don't like about them is
that there is no late binding as to the size, Ada has late binding and
I thought it could be useful (I only know because Rob Netzer and I
wrote an Ada compiler for CS736 at UW-Madison that did a lot of Ada
but exceptions and late binding we did not do).
--lm
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-05-11 22:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 48+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-05-11 21:49 Ron Natalie
2017-05-11 22:01 ` Arthur Krewat
2017-05-11 23:44 ` Dave Horsfall
2017-05-11 22:03 ` David Arnold
2017-05-11 22:32 ` Larry McVoy [this message]
2017-05-11 22:41 ` Ron Natalie
2017-05-13 1:24 ` Larry McVoy
2017-05-13 2:45 ` Ron Natalie
2017-05-13 12:20 ` Michael Kjörling
2017-05-13 12:35 ` Tim Bradshaw
2017-05-13 12:42 ` Michael Kjörling
2017-05-13 15:36 ` Stephen Kitt
2017-05-14 1:59 ` Lawrence Stewart
2017-05-14 2:23 ` Dave Horsfall
2017-05-14 4:24 ` Bakul Shah
2017-05-14 6:12 ` Steve Johnson
2017-05-14 6:48 ` Bakul Shah
2017-05-14 23:06 ` Ron Natalie
2017-05-14 23:34 ` Arthur Krewat
2017-05-15 0:14 ` Dan Cross
2017-05-15 0:23 ` Ron Natalie
2017-05-15 3:43 ` Random832
2017-05-15 0:40 ` Larry McVoy
2017-05-15 2:00 ` Nevin Liber
2017-05-15 10:21 ` Tony Finch
2017-05-15 4:35 ` Dave Horsfall
2017-05-15 4:54 ` Bakul Shah
2017-05-15 5:01 ` Dave Horsfall
2017-05-15 12:58 ` Michael Kjörling
2017-05-15 16:58 ` Dave Horsfall
2017-05-15 19:00 ` [TUHS] cdecl (Re: " Bakul Shah
2017-05-15 22:52 ` Dave Horsfall
2017-05-13 13:46 ` [TUHS] " Hellwig Geisse
2017-05-13 19:08 ` Random832
2017-05-13 23:21 ` Dave Horsfall
2017-05-14 14:48 ` Nemo
2017-05-13 19:05 ` Random832
2017-05-14 13:14 ` Derek Fawcus
2017-05-12 0:15 ` Bakul Shah
2017-05-12 2:41 ` Theo Pavlidis
2017-05-12 14:04 Richard Tobin
2017-05-13 23:11 Richard Tobin
2017-05-15 6:46 ` Tim Bradshaw
2017-05-14 14:11 Doug McIlroy
2017-05-14 14:58 ` Steve Nickolas
2017-05-15 18:47 Steve Johnson
2017-05-15 19:54 ` Bakul Shah
2017-05-16 7:25 ` George Ross
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170511223232.GM4341@mcvoy.com \
--to=lm@mcvoy.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).