From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: lm@mcvoy.com (Larry McVoy)
Date: Thu, 11 May 2017 17:16:26 -0700
Subject: [TUHS] The evolution of Unix facilities and architecture
In-Reply-To: <alpine.BSF.2.20.1705120944510.67621@aneurin.horsfall.org>
References: <20170511140729.2262B18C09A@mercury.lcs.mit.edu>
 <CAC20D2MDG0Mc3jJcbvZYXCo_FZcswt_no=3ajqvx45r-q9gKow@mail.gmail.com>
 <CANCZdfrbxzkMesjPPX3A0qcHL-Hz_g+k1F2PtBicOkZv3JB5Cw@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAC20D2Ndb54AqUx=qn48Rkc37b7pr9rwEVs+m+Aq1zR6ALjw6w@mail.gmail.com>
 <013b01d2ca96$6901b370$3b051a50$@ronnatalie.com>
 <20170511222547.GJ4341@mcvoy.com>
 <alpine.BSF.2.20.1705120944510.67621@aneurin.horsfall.org>
Message-ID: <20170512001626.GQ4341@mcvoy.com>

On Fri, May 12, 2017 at 09:47:01AM +1000, Dave Horsfall wrote:
> On Thu, 11 May 2017, Larry McVoy wrote:
> 
> [...]
> 
> > Try the same thing with Linux.  The file system will come back, starting 
> > with, I believe, ext2.
> 
> That's a journalled FS, isn't it?  In which case the transactions get
> replayed.

My memory is ext2 is not journaled, I think that happened in ext3.  Or 
maybe it was an option on ext2?  Either way, I think ext2 did the right
thing without the journal.