From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: dfawcus+lists-tuhs@employees.org (Derek Fawcus)
Date: Sun, 14 May 2017 13:55:43 +0100
Subject: [TUHS] The evolution of Unix facilities and architecture
In-Reply-To: <1038e644-cef1-9424-f6fa-288941033bff@gmail.com>
References: <20170513004423.F3A9C18C099@mercury.lcs.mit.edu>
 <1494636703.1615694.975085000.13626EAC@webmail.messagingengine.com>
 <8B3FFD9C-FA5F-434F-A18E-FF59215C6DDD@quintile.net>
 <CAC20D2NHZ0kzuGJmtBFxXwQSiT-33KiokV2Gi3pEyf6m5Nqp3A@mail.gmail.com>
 <1038e644-cef1-9424-f6fa-288941033bff@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <20170514125543.GA81508@cowbell.employees.org>

On Sat, May 13, 2017 at 01:19:42PM -0400, William Pechter wrote:
> When VMS went to 3.6 or so a friend of mine was almost fired by DEC for 
> randomly testing boxes looking
> to see DEC's internal boxes weren't running System/Manager, 
> Field/Service and UETP/UETP User/password
> combinations.

Those default account combinations were still being used to gain
access to VMS systems in the '87-'89 time frame;  although
user/password was less interesting by itself,  being an unpriviledged
account.

DF