From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: arnold@skeeve.com (arnold@skeeve.com) Date: Sat, 16 Sep 2017 23:19:51 -0600 Subject: [TUHS] Happy birthday, Dennis Ritchie! In-Reply-To: <20170917014349.GW3272@mcvoy.com> References: <201709100944.v8A9iPeb024293@freefriends.org> <20170914161121.sx7eqzsqklzcncdb@matica.foolinux.mooo.com> <20170914193905.GD25914@wopr> <20170914213535.4ptpo7jtaem6x5tf@thunk.org> <20170916034032.GO3272@mcvoy.com> <201709161920.v8GJK0ec020998@freefriends.org> <20170917014349.GW3272@mcvoy.com> Message-ID: <201709170519.v8H5JpKx003398@freefriends.org> RMS wrote GCC initially. And Emacs if that's what you use. And GDB initially as well. RMS did Texinfo (even if you don't like it yourself, it's a very nice markup language). Bash, gawk, sed, grep, coreutils were (and still are) maintained by unpaid volunteers, true, but they all were started for the GNU project. (Bash in the early days may have been funded by the FSF.) You're welcome to stand by your comment, but --- as a GNU maintainer for close to 30 years --- I think you paint with too broad a brush. More than enough said, Arnold Larry McVoy wrote: > I stand by my comment. I'm friends with the Cygnus folks, they would > tend to agree with me I think. > > All that stuff you listed, can you list the things that the GNU/FSF > people have funded? Because I think there is close to nothing. All of > that stuff is stuff that came under the GNU umbrella but they didn't do > the coding. > > I give credit to RMS for the GPL, that was cool. But claiming credit > for stuff that GNU/FSF didn't do was not cool. > > On Sat, Sep 16, 2017 at 01:20:00PM -0600, arnold at skeeve.com wrote: > > Larry McVoy wrote: > > > > > The GNU guys have written very, very little code. > > > > Um, let's see: Bash. gawk. sed. grep. coreutils. binutils. gcc. ... > > Essentially everything that was used from the command line on a > > standard Unix system. All reimplemented from scratch. > > > > Many GNU maintainers are active (directly or indirectly) in the > > POSIX standard efforts which influences all Unix implementations. > > > > > They are all about the license, which is fine, but I get off the bus > > > when they are claiming credit for work they did not do. > > > > This not true of ALL the GNU project maintainers. Don't tar everyone > > with RMS's brush. > > > > 'nuff said, > > > > And, IMHO, all this is WAY off topic and probably should be brought > > to a close. > > > > Arnold > > -- > --- > Larry McVoy lm at mcvoy.com http://www.mcvoy.com/lm