From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: itz@very.loosely.org (Ian Zimmerman) Date: Sat, 23 Sep 2017 08:41:54 -0700 Subject: [TUHS] Excessive bouncing ... argh! In-Reply-To: <20170923141232.aotf4m5eol6gr3v6@thunk.org> References: <20170921223420.GA27231@minnie.tuhs.org> <1bfefa2f-4433-0d13-5972-ffb92bae3fa1@tnetconsulting.net> <20170923141232.aotf4m5eol6gr3v6@thunk.org> Message-ID: <20170923154154.yjahwnhzlt6qvwf4@matica.foolinux.mooo.com> On 2017-09-23 10:12, Theodore Ts'o wrote: > Other proposed solutions is to have the mailing list software detect > that you are using DMARC, and only having *your* postings munged so > the from field says thus at minnie.tugs.org, instead of > gtaylor at tnetconsulting.net. That way only people who are using mail > systems with DMARC get their From field munged, instead of punishing > everyone using the mailing list. That has been the reaction of every list I've seen react to the DMARC problem at all. Among others: haskell-cafe, exim-users, SDLU. Initially I hated to make even this concession to "modern industry standards", but now I think it's the best compromise, until the Internet Octopuses kill email completely. -- Please don't Cc: me privately on mailing lists and Usenet, if you also post the followup to the list or newsgroup. Do obvious transformation on domain to reply privately _only_ on Usenet.