From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: itz@very.loosely.org (Ian Zimmerman)
Date: Sun, 1 Oct 2017 21:04:48 -0700
Subject: SunOS to Solaris - why?
In-Reply-To: <20171002003854.GU16755@mcvoy.com>
References: <14fc91a9-922c-c73a-0fb1-78e8c3cd92ea@kilonet.net>
 <20171002003854.GU16755@mcvoy.com>
Message-ID: <20171002040448.cx4ijj2fcmtqton4@matica.foolinux.mooo.com>

On 2017-10-01 17:38, Larry McVoy wrote:

> On Sun, Oct 01, 2017 at 12:59:42PM -0400, Arthur Krewat via TUHSmangle wrote:
> > From Sun's point of view, what was the REAL reason to move from
> > SunOS to Solaris?

> As I've said elsewhere, Sun was out of money.  AT&T bought $200m of
> Sun stock at 35% over market but Sun had to dump SunOS and got to
> SVR4.
> 
> I don't know if Scooter knew what he was dumping or not, I suspect not
> but all those late nights when he came over to egg us kernel geeks on,
> maybe he did know.  I don't think he had a choice.

I seem to be missing one or two messages per day on this list to
complete the threads.  No big deal, but I'm a perfectionist and it
grates.

The message by Arthur to which Larry was replying had been one of the
missing ones.  I have checked my MTA log and there is no trace of the
Message-ID of Arthur's message.  So it is definitely _not_ the case that
I received it but it went "into the spam bin".

As far as I can tell I'm on the "non-mangled" part of the team.

-- 
Please don't Cc: me privately on mailing lists and Usenet,
if you also post the followup to the list or newsgroup.
Do obvious transformation on domain to reply privately _only_ on Usenet.