From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: bakul@bitblocks.com (Bakul Shah)
Date: Mon, 06 Nov 2017 08:21:02 -0800
Subject: [TUHS] TERM for v8
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Sun, 05 Nov 2017 15:42:19 -0500."
 <CABH=_VTSFJrGtgkpT=hMgr_Ho76DLLOgN3e600bcFRD7U3cifA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <7247d8f1-2100-ff26-fc33-d5e782adea7a@gmail.com>
 <F8046D9A-19EB-40F4-822F-E2E4A255AFB2@jctaylor.com>
 <61E89B92-FC04-43B6-9AC2-2752BC146528@ccc.com>
 <5da5899d-1768-7970-4316-a75c92c7cd54@gmail.com>
 <95C8CDF3-7290-4416-83A9-F9A23058AF3D@ccc.com>
 <712a3d52-7b3e-b4ac-b1c1-a65ca5a863ab@gmail.com>
 <20171105190037.71E88156E7D7@mail.bitblocks.com>
 <3c04537a-70d3-e37f-017a-0e6439c199ec@gmail.com>
 <20171105194334.35487156E7D7@mail.bitblocks.com>
 <CABH=_VTSFJrGtgkpT=hMgr_Ho76DLLOgN3e600bcFRD7U3cifA@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <20171106162117.A8F8D156E7D7@mail.bitblocks.com>

On Sun, 05 Nov 2017 15:42:19 -0500 Paul Winalski <paul.winalski at gmail.com> wrote:
Paul Winalski writes:
> On 11/5/17, Bakul Shah <bakul at bitblocks.com> wrote:
> >
> > I have no clue about v8 but at least in v7 these were
> > different drivers.  Looking at v7/usr/sys/dev/kl.c I don't see
> > klioctl() like dzioctl() in the dz driver. So my guess is
> > console ioctls return EINVAL.
> >
> That would seem to indicate that stty isn't checking for ioctl()
> failure.  Or at least it isn't displaying an error message if that
> happens.

Yes, v8 stty ignores all ioctl results! v8 has cons.c for the
console device and it basically ignores ioctls.