From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: itz@very.loosely.org (Ian Zimmerman) Date: Sat, 11 Nov 2017 08:40:21 -0800 Subject: [TUHS] 80 columns ... In-Reply-To: <201711102102.vAAL2tM6024205@darkstar.fourwinds.com> References: <7wpo8rud7y.fsf@junk.nocrew.org> <60C45CFF-0B5C-4DAB-8936-BA27ECFFA487@gmail.com> <025501d3598f$008f19d0$01ad4d70$@ronnatalie.com> <201711101905.vAAJ5SpV031420@darkstar.fourwinds.com> <47fee362-0fde-69ff-7794-a88cf3069030@telegraphics.com.au> <201711102043.vAAKhaYB020128@darkstar.fourwinds.com> <20171110205806.GB29606@mcvoy.com> <201711102102.vAAL2tM6024205@darkstar.fourwinds.com> Message-ID: <20171111164021.73q4mmgq2i3xozed@matica.foolinux.mooo.com> On 2017-11-10 13:02, Jon Steinhart wrote: > As an example, I abhor styles that say that continuations of long > lines should be indented either an extra tab or right-aligned with the > first line. Wait, so _how_ do you like continuations to be indented? -- Please don't Cc: me privately on mailing lists and Usenet, if you also post the followup to the list or newsgroup. To reply privately _only_ on Usenet, fetch the TXT record for the domain.