From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: itz@very.loosely.org (Ian Zimmerman) Date: Thu, 16 Nov 2017 19:56:15 -0800 Subject: [TUHS] TECO was: Re: basic tools / Universal Unix In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20171117035615.55nojmey5wz4fz63@matica.foolinux.mooo.com> On 2017-11-17 10:38, George Michaelson wrote: > Actually no, I still hate colour LS. I like ls -F because the implied > extra information can be semantically extracted with a grep, although > why find . -type d -maxdepth 1 isn't being used is beyond me. Colorized ls can show you other things. For example: * setuid/setgid files * broken symlinks ls -F can't do these. Myself, I like ls itself to be colourless, but I do have an alias "cls" and use it often. -- Please don't Cc: me privately on mailing lists and Usenet, if you also post the followup to the list or newsgroup. To reply privately _only_ on Usenet, fetch the TXT record for the domain.