From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: itz@very.loosely.org (Ian Zimmerman)
Date: Sun, 17 Dec 2017 13:24:00 -0800
Subject: [TUHS] OT: trains [Was: Date madness]
In-Reply-To: <02cd01d37772$a37865b0$ea693110$@ronnatalie.com>
References: <1513203404.29181.for-standards-violators@oclsc.org>
 <201712140024.vBE0OZQC079168@elf.torek.net>
 <024e01d37752$f1e95260$d5bbf720$@ronnatalie.com>
 <m2vah5uqxp.fsf@thuvia.hamartun.priv.no>
 <02cd01d37772$a37865b0$ea693110$@ronnatalie.com>
Message-ID: <20171217212400.x7r3lwqopjzs5g5o@matica.foolinux.mooo.com>

On 2017-12-17 15:07, Ron Natalie wrote:

> Amtrak has an amusing way of handling the time change.  A train just
> never departs before it's published time.  This means in the spring;
> the trains just tend to run an hour late (or later than normal).  In
> the fall, the train sits at whatever station it had arrived at before
> 2 AM and waits until the clock catches up.

How do other train systems handle it, e.g. the European intercity system?

-- 
Please don't Cc: me privately on mailing lists and Usenet,
if you also post the followup to the list or newsgroup.
To reply privately _only_ on Usenet, fetch the TXT record for the domain.